mirror of
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2026-08-31 08:15:07 -04:00
Bluetooth: RFCOMM: take rfcomm_mutex for the deferred setup accept
rfcomm_sock_recvmsg() completes a deferred setup by calling
rfcomm_dlc_accept() without holding any RFCOMM lock:
if (test_and_clear_bit(RFCOMM_DEFER_SETUP, &d->flags)) {
rfcomm_dlc_accept(d);
return 0;
}
and rfcomm_dlc_accept() dereferences the session on its first line:
struct sock *sk = d->session->sock->sk;
Every other path that touches d->session runs under rfcomm_mutex:
rfcomm_dlc_open(), rfcomm_dlc_close(), rfcomm_dlc_exists(),
rfcomm_dlc_send_rpn(), and the RFCOMM thread through
rfcomm_process_sessions(). rfcomm_connect_ind() is even documented as
"called under rfcomm_lock()". This call site is the only one that skips
it.
The RFCOMM_DEFER_SETUP bit looks like it serialises the accept against
teardown, since __rfcomm_dlc_close() returns early when it wins the
test_and_clear. But rfcomm_recv_disc() forces the state first:
d->state = BT_CLOSED;
__rfcomm_dlc_close(d, err);
and the early return only covers BT_CONNECT, BT_CONFIG, BT_OPEN and
BT_CONNECT2. With the state already BT_CLOSED that switch does not
match, the bit is never consulted, and __rfcomm_dlc_close() falls
through to rfcomm_dlc_unlink(), which sets d->session = NULL.
So a remote DISC on a deferred dlc clears the session while leaving
RFCOMM_DEFER_SETUP set. The next recvmsg() then passes the
test_and_clear and dereferences a NULL session. No timing window is
needed: once the DISC has been processed, the dereference is
unconditional.
Give rfcomm_dlc_accept() the same shape as rfcomm_dlc_open() and
rfcomm_dlc_close(): an exported wrapper that takes rfcomm_mutex and
re-checks the session, around a __rfcomm_dlc_accept() that the two
in-core callers, which already hold the mutex, keep using.
Reproduced on a KASAN + PROVE_LOCKING kernel with a BR/EDR peer emulated
over /dev/vhci: the peer brings up an ACL link, opens L2CAP on the
RFCOMM PSM, starts a session, opens a dlc on a channel bound with
BT_DEFER_SETUP, and sends DISC after the socket is accepted. recv() on
the accepted socket then hits:
Oops: general protection fault
KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000010-0x0000000000000017]
RIP: 0010:rfcomm_dlc_accept+0x54/0x350
Call Trace:
rfcomm_sock_recvmsg+0x1cd/0x230
sock_recvmsg+0x166/0x1c0
__sys_recvfrom+0x20d/0x300
0x10 is the offset of sock in struct rfcomm_session. With this patch the
same run completes with recv() returning 0 and no report, and lockdep
stays quiet, confirming rfcomm_mutex is still taken before lock_sock on
this path as it is on the thread side.
Fixes: bb23c0ab82 ("Bluetooth: Add support for deferring RFCOMM connection setup")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ali Ahmet Memis <ali@iusegentoo.com>
Signed-off-by: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.von.dentz@intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
committed by
Luiz Augusto von Dentz
parent
0079e1a944
commit
43a556b2fd
@@ -1331,7 +1331,10 @@ static struct rfcomm_session *rfcomm_recv_disc(struct rfcomm_session *s,
|
||||
return s;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void rfcomm_dlc_accept(struct rfcomm_dlc *d)
|
||||
/* Must be called with rfcomm_mutex held, so that the session cannot be
|
||||
* unlinked from under us.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static void __rfcomm_dlc_accept(struct rfcomm_dlc *d)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct sock *sk = d->session->sock->sk;
|
||||
struct l2cap_conn *conn = l2cap_pi(sk)->chan->conn;
|
||||
@@ -1353,6 +1356,21 @@ void rfcomm_dlc_accept(struct rfcomm_dlc *d)
|
||||
rfcomm_send_msc(d->session, 1, d->dlci, d->v24_sig);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void rfcomm_dlc_accept(struct rfcomm_dlc *d)
|
||||
{
|
||||
rfcomm_lock();
|
||||
|
||||
/* rfcomm_recv_disc() sets the dlc state to BT_CLOSED before calling
|
||||
* __rfcomm_dlc_close(), so the RFCOMM_DEFER_SETUP handshake there is
|
||||
* skipped and the session can already be unlinked by the time the
|
||||
* deferred accept runs from rfcomm_sock_recvmsg().
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (d->session)
|
||||
__rfcomm_dlc_accept(d);
|
||||
|
||||
rfcomm_unlock();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static void rfcomm_check_accept(struct rfcomm_dlc *d)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (rfcomm_check_security(d)) {
|
||||
@@ -1365,7 +1383,7 @@ static void rfcomm_check_accept(struct rfcomm_dlc *d)
|
||||
d->state_change(d, 0);
|
||||
rfcomm_dlc_unlock(d);
|
||||
} else
|
||||
rfcomm_dlc_accept(d);
|
||||
__rfcomm_dlc_accept(d);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
set_bit(RFCOMM_AUTH_PENDING, &d->flags);
|
||||
rfcomm_dlc_set_timer(d, RFCOMM_AUTH_TIMEOUT);
|
||||
@@ -1958,7 +1976,7 @@ static void rfcomm_process_dlcs(struct rfcomm_session *s)
|
||||
d->state_change(d, 0);
|
||||
rfcomm_dlc_unlock(d);
|
||||
} else
|
||||
rfcomm_dlc_accept(d);
|
||||
__rfcomm_dlc_accept(d);
|
||||
}
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
} else if (test_and_clear_bit(RFCOMM_AUTH_REJECT, &d->flags)) {
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user