net/sched: cls_bpf: prevent unbounded recursion in offload rollback

Quan Sun reported [1] a stack overflow in cls_bpf_offload_cmd().

Reproducer on netdevsim: add a skip_sw cls_bpf filter, set the
bpf_tc_accept debugfs knob to 0, then `tc filter replace`. The replace
calls tc_setup_cb_replace() which fails. cls_bpf_offload_cmd() then
swaps prog/oldprog and recursively calls itself to roll back. But
bpf_tc_accept=0 makes the rollback fail too, which triggers yet another
rollback frame with the same arguments, and so on until the stack is
exhausted.

bpf_tc_accept is just a convenient knob for the reproducer. Any driver
whose tc_setup_cb_replace() fails twice in a row can hit the same loop,
so this is not a netdevsim-only issue.

Two ways to fix it:

  1) Have the rollback call tc_setup_cb_add() on oldprog instead of
     re-entering cls_bpf_offload_cmd().
  2) Mark the rollback frame with a flag and skip a second-level
     rollback from inside it.

Go with (2). It is the smaller change and keeps the original behaviour:
the rollback still goes through tc_setup_cb_replace(), so the driver
gets one real chance to restore its state. If that attempt also fails,
we just return the original error instead of recursing.

[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/ce5a6005-3c5e-4696-9e05-eba9461dc860@std.uestc.edu.cn/T/#u

Fixes: 102740bd94 ("cls_bpf: fix offload assumptions after callback conversion")
Reviewed-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jiayuan Chen <jiayuan.chen@linux.dev>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260526025529.24382-1-jiayuan.chen@linux.dev
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
Jiayuan Chen
2026-05-26 10:55:29 +08:00
committed by Jakub Kicinski
parent 36d0d876c4
commit 27db54b90b

View File

@@ -142,7 +142,8 @@ static bool cls_bpf_is_ebpf(const struct cls_bpf_prog *prog)
static int cls_bpf_offload_cmd(struct tcf_proto *tp, struct cls_bpf_prog *prog,
struct cls_bpf_prog *oldprog,
struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
struct netlink_ext_ack *extack,
bool is_rollback)
{
struct tcf_block *block = tp->chain->block;
struct tc_cls_bpf_offload cls_bpf = {};
@@ -177,7 +178,8 @@ static int cls_bpf_offload_cmd(struct tcf_proto *tp, struct cls_bpf_prog *prog,
&oldprog->in_hw_count, true);
if (prog && err) {
cls_bpf_offload_cmd(tp, oldprog, prog, extack);
if (!is_rollback)
cls_bpf_offload_cmd(tp, oldprog, prog, extack, true);
return err;
}
@@ -208,7 +210,7 @@ static int cls_bpf_offload(struct tcf_proto *tp, struct cls_bpf_prog *prog,
if (!prog && !oldprog)
return 0;
return cls_bpf_offload_cmd(tp, prog, oldprog, extack);
return cls_bpf_offload_cmd(tp, prog, oldprog, extack, false);
}
static void cls_bpf_stop_offload(struct tcf_proto *tp,
@@ -217,7 +219,7 @@ static void cls_bpf_stop_offload(struct tcf_proto *tp,
{
int err;
err = cls_bpf_offload_cmd(tp, NULL, prog, extack);
err = cls_bpf_offload_cmd(tp, NULL, prog, extack, false);
if (err)
pr_err("Stopping hardware offload failed: %d\n", err);
}