drm/xe/guc: Fix handling of GUC_HXG_TYPE_NO_RESPONSE_BUSY

If GuC responds with the NO_RESPONSE_BUSY message, we extend
our timeout while waiting for the actual response, but we wrongly
assumed that the next message will be RESPONSE_SUCCESS, missing
that we still can get RESPONSE_FAILURE.

Change the condition for the expected message type, using only
common bits from RESPONSE_SUCCESS and RESPONSE_FAILURE (as they
differ, by ABI design, only by the last bit).

v2: add comment/checks to the code (Matt)

Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
Michal Wajdeczko
2023-11-16 16:12:41 +01:00
committed by Rodrigo Vivi
parent cd1c9c54c3
commit 1d087cb7d8

View File

@@ -659,9 +659,20 @@ int xe_guc_mmio_send_recv(struct xe_guc *guc, const u32 *request,
header = xe_mmio_read32(gt, reply_reg);
if (FIELD_GET(GUC_HXG_MSG_0_TYPE, header) ==
GUC_HXG_TYPE_NO_RESPONSE_BUSY) {
/*
* Once we got a BUSY reply we must wait again for the final
* response but this time we can't use ORIGIN mask anymore.
* To spot a right change in the reply, we take advantage that
* response SUCCESS and FAILURE differ only by the single bit
* and all other bits are set and can be used as a new mask.
*/
u32 resp_bits = GUC_HXG_TYPE_RESPONSE_SUCCESS & GUC_HXG_TYPE_RESPONSE_FAILURE;
u32 resp_mask = FIELD_PREP(GUC_HXG_MSG_0_TYPE, resp_bits);
ret = xe_mmio_wait32(gt, reply_reg, GUC_HXG_MSG_0_TYPE,
FIELD_PREP(GUC_HXG_MSG_0_TYPE, GUC_HXG_TYPE_RESPONSE_SUCCESS),
BUILD_BUG_ON(FIELD_MAX(GUC_HXG_MSG_0_TYPE) != GUC_HXG_TYPE_RESPONSE_SUCCESS);
BUILD_BUG_ON((GUC_HXG_TYPE_RESPONSE_SUCCESS ^ GUC_HXG_TYPE_RESPONSE_FAILURE) != 1);
ret = xe_mmio_wait32(gt, reply_reg, resp_mask, resp_mask,
1000000, &header, false);
if (unlikely(FIELD_GET(GUC_HXG_MSG_0_ORIGIN, header) !=