xfs: opencode xfs_zone_record_blocks

We only have a single caller, no need to keep it in its own function.

Signed-off-by: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@redhat.com>
[hch: add zone_record_blocks trace back]
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Carlos Maiolino <cem@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
Carlos Maiolino
2026-03-10 18:36:49 +01:00
parent 3bdc20b005
commit 01478f356f

View File

@@ -201,27 +201,6 @@ xfs_zone_inc_written(
xfs_open_zone_mark_full(oz);
}
static void
xfs_zone_record_blocks(
struct xfs_trans *tp,
struct xfs_open_zone *oz,
xfs_fsblock_t fsbno,
xfs_filblks_t len)
{
struct xfs_mount *mp = tp->t_mountp;
struct xfs_rtgroup *rtg = oz->oz_rtg;
struct xfs_inode *rmapip = rtg_rmap(rtg);
trace_xfs_zone_record_blocks(oz, xfs_rtb_to_rgbno(mp, fsbno), len);
xfs_rtgroup_lock(rtg, XFS_RTGLOCK_RMAP);
xfs_rtgroup_trans_join(tp, rtg, XFS_RTGLOCK_RMAP);
rmapip->i_used_blocks += len;
ASSERT(rmapip->i_used_blocks <= rtg_blocks(rtg));
xfs_zone_inc_written(oz, len);
xfs_trans_log_inode(tp, rmapip, XFS_ILOG_CORE);
}
/*
* Called for blocks that have been written to disk, but not actually linked to
* an inode, which can happen when garbage collection races with user data
@@ -252,6 +231,8 @@ xfs_zoned_map_extent(
xfs_fsblock_t old_startblock)
{
struct xfs_bmbt_irec data;
struct xfs_rtgroup *rtg = oz->oz_rtg;
struct xfs_inode *rmapip = rtg_rmap(rtg);
int nmaps = 1;
int error;
@@ -310,7 +291,15 @@ xfs_zoned_map_extent(
}
}
xfs_zone_record_blocks(tp, oz, new->br_startblock, new->br_blockcount);
trace_xfs_zone_record_blocks(oz,
xfs_rtb_to_rgbno(tp->t_mountp, new->br_startblock),
new->br_blockcount);
xfs_rtgroup_lock(rtg, XFS_RTGLOCK_RMAP);
xfs_rtgroup_trans_join(tp, rtg, XFS_RTGLOCK_RMAP);
rmapip->i_used_blocks += new->br_blockcount;
ASSERT(rmapip->i_used_blocks <= rtg_blocks(rtg));
xfs_zone_inc_written(oz, new->br_blockcount);
xfs_trans_log_inode(tp, rmapip, XFS_ILOG_CORE);
/* Map the new blocks into the data fork. */
xfs_bmap_map_extent(tp, ip, XFS_DATA_FORK, new);