mirror of
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2026-05-07 06:50:43 -04:00
e708e2bd55
Daniel Borkmann says:
====================
pull-request: bpf 2020-06-30
The following pull-request contains BPF updates for your *net* tree.
We've added 28 non-merge commits during the last 9 day(s) which contain
a total of 35 files changed, 486 insertions(+), 232 deletions(-).
The main changes are:
1) Fix an incorrect verifier branch elimination for PTR_TO_BTF_ID pointer
types, from Yonghong Song.
2) Fix UAPI for sockmap and flow_dissector progs that were ignoring various
arguments passed to BPF_PROG_{ATTACH,DETACH}, from Lorenz Bauer & Jakub Sitnicki.
3) Fix broken AF_XDP DMA hacks that are poking into dma-direct and swiotlb
internals and integrate it properly into DMA core, from Christoph Hellwig.
4) Fix RCU splat from recent changes to avoid skipping ingress policy when
kTLS is enabled, from John Fastabend.
5) Fix BPF ringbuf map to enforce size to be the power of 2 in order for its
position masking to work, from Andrii Nakryiko.
6) Fix regression from CAP_BPF work to re-allow CAP_SYS_ADMIN for loading
of network programs, from Maciej Żenczykowski.
7) Fix libbpf section name prefix for devmap progs, from Jesper Dangaard Brouer.
8) Fix formatting in UAPI documentation for BPF helpers, from Quentin Monnet.
====================
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
================== BPF Selftest Notes ================== General instructions on running selftests can be found in `Documentation/bpf/bpf_devel_QA.rst`_. Additional information about selftest failures are documented here. bpf_iter test failures with clang/llvm 10.0.0 ============================================= With clang/llvm 10.0.0, the following two bpf_iter tests failed: * ``bpf_iter/ipv6_route`` * ``bpf_iter/netlink`` The symptom for ``bpf_iter/ipv6_route`` looks like .. code-block:: c 2: (79) r8 = *(u64 *)(r1 +8) ... 14: (bf) r2 = r8 15: (0f) r2 += r1 ; BPF_SEQ_PRINTF(seq, "%pi6 %02x ", &rt->fib6_dst.addr, rt->fib6_dst.plen); 16: (7b) *(u64 *)(r8 +64) = r2 only read is supported The symptom for ``bpf_iter/netlink`` looks like .. code-block:: c ; struct netlink_sock *nlk = ctx->sk; 2: (79) r7 = *(u64 *)(r1 +8) ... 15: (bf) r2 = r7 16: (0f) r2 += r1 ; BPF_SEQ_PRINTF(seq, "%pK %-3d ", s, s->sk_protocol); 17: (7b) *(u64 *)(r7 +0) = r2 only read is supported This is due to a llvm BPF backend bug. The fix https://reviews.llvm.org/D78466 has been pushed to llvm 10.x release branch and will be available in 10.0.1. The fix is available in llvm 11.0.0 trunk.