The DL scheduler keeps the current task in the rbtree, since
the deadline value isn't usually chagned while the task is
runnable.
This results in set_next_task() and put_prev_task() being
simpler, but unfortunately this causes complexity elsewhere.
Specifically when update_curr_dl() updates the deadline, it has
to dequeue and then enqueue the task.
From put_prev_task_dl(), we first call update_curr_dl(), and
then call enqueue_pushable_dl_task().
However, with Proxy Exec this goes awry. Since when a mutex is
released, we might wake the waiting rq->donor. This will cause
put_prev_task() to be called on the donor to take it off the
cpu for return migration.
At that point, from put_prev_task_dl() the update_curr_dl()
logic will dequeue & enqueue the task, and the enqueue function
will call enqueue_pushable_dl_task() (since the task_current()
check won't prevent it). Then back up the callstack in
put_prev_task_dl() we'll end up calling
enqueue_pushable_dl_task() again, tripping the
!RB_EMPTY_NODE(&p->pushable_dl_tasks) warning.
So to avoid this, use Peter's suggested[1] approach, and add a
dl_rq->curr pointer that is set/cleared from set_next_task()/
put_prev_task(), which effectively tracks the rq->donor. We can
then use this to avoid adding the active donor to the pushable
list from enqueue_task_dl().
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20260304095123.GP606826@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net/
Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260512025635.2840817-4-jstultz@google.com
cd8e62c858