mirror of
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2026-07-24 13:52:58 -04:00
2d5a7d406e
The pwrseq core takes three locks in consistent order everywhere:
pwrseq_sem -> pwrseq->rw_lock -> pwrseq->state_lock
pwrseq_get() -> pwrseq_match_device() takes pwrseq_sem for reading, then
rw_lock for reading. pwrseq_power_on()/pwrseq_power_off() take rw_lock
for reading and then state_lock.
pwrseq_device_unregister() is the only exception, it takes: state_lock,
then rw_lock for writing and finally pwrseq_sem for writing. This created
two potential ABBA deadlock situations that sashiko pointed out.
- pwrseq_power_on/off() take rw_lock for reading then state_lock, while
pwrseq_unregister() takes state_lock then rw_lock for writing
- pwrseq_get() takes pwrseq_sem for reading then rw_lock for reading,
while pwrseq_unregister() takes rw_lock for writing then pwrseq_sem
for writing
Reorder the unregister path to taking pwrseq_sem for writing -> rw_lock
for writing and drop the state_lock entirely. This is safe as
enable_count is only ever written under rw_lock held for read (via
pwrseq_unit_enable()/disable(), reached only from pwrseq_power_on/off()),
so holding rw_lock for writing already excludes every other writer and
reader and the active-users WARN() stays race-free without state_lock.
Fixes: 249ebf3f65 ("power: sequencing: implement the pwrseq core")
Closes: https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260616151049.1705503-1-vulab%40iscas.ac.cn
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260618-pwrseq-abba-deadlock-v1-1-943a3fd81c06@oss.qualcomm.com
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@oss.qualcomm.com>