Files
linux/kernel
Paul E. McKenney c41247e1d4 signal: Explain local_irq_save() call
The explicit local_irq_save() in __lock_task_sighand() is needed to avoid
a potential deadlock condition, as noted in a841796f11 (signal:
align __lock_task_sighand() irq disabling and RCU).  However, someone
reading the code might be forgiven for concluding that this separate
local_irq_save() was completely unnecessary.  This commit therefore adds
a comment referencing the shiny new block comment on rcu_read_unlock().

Reported-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
2014-07-09 09:14:33 -07:00
..
2014-06-10 15:34:46 -07:00
2014-06-12 13:43:08 +02:00
2014-06-06 16:08:14 -07:00
2014-05-16 13:22:48 -04:00
2014-07-09 09:14:33 -07:00
2013-09-11 15:58:27 -07:00
2014-04-30 13:46:17 +02:00