Files
linux/include/net
Daniel Borkmann eea86af6b1 net: sock: adapt SOCK_MIN_RCVBUF and SOCK_MIN_SNDBUF
The current situation is that SOCK_MIN_RCVBUF is 2048 + sizeof(struct sk_buff))
while SOCK_MIN_SNDBUF is 2048. Since in both cases, skb->truesize is used for
sk_{r,w}mem_alloc accounting, we should have both sizes adjusted via defining a
TCP_SKB_MIN_TRUESIZE.

Further, as Eric Dumazet points out, the minimal skb truesize in transmit path is
SKB_TRUESIZE(2048) after commit f07d960df3 ("tcp: avoid frag allocation for
small frames"), and tcp_sendmsg() tries to limit skb size to half the congestion
window, meaning we try to build two skbs at minimum. Thus, having SOCK_MIN_SNDBUF
as 2048 can hit a small regression for some applications setting to low
SO_SNDBUF / SO_RCVBUF. Note that we define a TCP_SKB_MIN_TRUESIZE, because
SKB_TRUESIZE(2048) adds SKB_DATA_ALIGN(sizeof(struct skb_shared_info)), but in
case of TCP skbs, the skb_shared_info is part of the 2048 bytes allocation for
skb->head.

The minor adaption in sk_stream_moderate_sndbuf() is to silence a warning by
using a typed max macro, as similarly done in SOCK_MIN_RCVBUF occurences, that
would appear otherwise.

Suggested-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2013-06-19 21:16:53 -07:00
..
2013-02-27 22:51:08 -05:00
2013-04-12 16:54:45 +02:00
2013-06-17 17:08:05 -07:00
2013-06-11 02:51:03 -07:00
2012-08-09 16:18:06 -07:00
2012-04-15 12:44:40 -04:00
2012-04-15 12:44:40 -04:00
2012-07-19 10:43:03 -07:00
2012-10-08 17:42:36 -04:00
2013-01-27 22:46:33 -05:00
2013-03-26 12:27:18 -04:00
2011-03-31 11:26:23 -03:00
2012-05-17 18:45:20 -04:00
2012-05-19 01:08:16 -04:00
2012-11-03 14:59:04 -04:00
2012-08-06 13:40:47 -07:00
2013-06-04 16:43:42 -07:00
2012-04-15 12:44:40 -04:00
2012-05-16 15:17:08 -04:00
2012-04-15 12:44:40 -04:00