mirror of
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2026-05-20 17:59:03 -04:00
d6b4206841
Add tests for perf event array with and without BPF_F_PRESERVE_ELEMS. Add a perf event to array via fd mfd. Without BPF_F_PRESERVE_ELEMS, the perf event is removed when mfd is closed. With BPF_F_PRESERVE_ELEMS, the perf event is removed when the map is freed. Signed-off-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200930224927.1936644-3-songliubraving@fb.com
================== BPF Selftest Notes ================== General instructions on running selftests can be found in `Documentation/bpf/bpf_devel_QA.rst`_. Additional information about selftest failures are documented here. bpf_iter test failures with clang/llvm 10.0.0 ============================================= With clang/llvm 10.0.0, the following two bpf_iter tests failed: * ``bpf_iter/ipv6_route`` * ``bpf_iter/netlink`` The symptom for ``bpf_iter/ipv6_route`` looks like .. code-block:: c 2: (79) r8 = *(u64 *)(r1 +8) ... 14: (bf) r2 = r8 15: (0f) r2 += r1 ; BPF_SEQ_PRINTF(seq, "%pi6 %02x ", &rt->fib6_dst.addr, rt->fib6_dst.plen); 16: (7b) *(u64 *)(r8 +64) = r2 only read is supported The symptom for ``bpf_iter/netlink`` looks like .. code-block:: c ; struct netlink_sock *nlk = ctx->sk; 2: (79) r7 = *(u64 *)(r1 +8) ... 15: (bf) r2 = r7 16: (0f) r2 += r1 ; BPF_SEQ_PRINTF(seq, "%pK %-3d ", s, s->sk_protocol); 17: (7b) *(u64 *)(r7 +0) = r2 only read is supported This is due to a llvm BPF backend bug. The fix https://reviews.llvm.org/D78466 has been pushed to llvm 10.x release branch and will be available in 10.0.1. The fix is available in llvm 11.0.0 trunk. BPF CO-RE-based tests and Clang version ======================================= A set of selftests use BPF target-specific built-ins, which might require bleeding-edge Clang versions (Clang 12 nightly at this time). Few sub-tests of core_reloc test suit (part of test_progs test runner) require the following built-ins, listed with corresponding Clang diffs introducing them to Clang/LLVM. These sub-tests are going to be skipped if Clang is too old to support them, they shouldn't cause build failures or runtime test failures: - __builtin_btf_type_id() ([0], [1], [2]); - __builtin_preserve_type_info(), __builtin_preserve_enum_value() ([3], [4]). [0] https://reviews.llvm.org/D74572 [1] https://reviews.llvm.org/D74668 [2] https://reviews.llvm.org/D85174 [3] https://reviews.llvm.org/D83878 [4] https://reviews.llvm.org/D83242