Files
linux/tools/testing/selftests/arm64
Mark Brown 94de486e42 kselftest/arm64: Correct misleading comments on fp-stress irritators
The comments in the handlers for the irritator signal in the test threads
for fp-stress suggest that the irritator will corrupt the register state
observed by the main thread but this is not the case, instead the FPSIMD
and SVE irritators (which are the only ones that are implemented) modify
the current register state which is expected to be overwritten on return
from the handler by the saved register state. Update the comment to reflect
what the handler is actually doing.

Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241107-arm64-fp-stress-irritator-v2-1-c4b9622e36ee@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2024-11-07 18:02:13 +00:00
..

KSelfTest ARM64
===============

- These tests are arm64 specific and so not built or run but just skipped
  completely when env-variable ARCH is found to be different than 'arm64'
  and `uname -m` reports other than 'aarch64'.

- Holding true the above, ARM64 KSFT tests can be run within the KSelfTest
  framework using standard Linux top-level-makefile targets:

      $ make TARGETS=arm64 kselftest-clean
      $ make TARGETS=arm64 kselftest

      or

      $ make -C tools/testing/selftests TARGETS=arm64 \
		INSTALL_PATH=<your-installation-path> install

      or, alternatively, only specific arm64/ subtargets can be picked:

      $ make -C tools/testing/selftests TARGETS=arm64 ARM64_SUBTARGETS="tags signal" \
		INSTALL_PATH=<your-installation-path> install

   Further details on building and running KFST can be found in:
     Documentation/dev-tools/kselftest.rst