Files
linux/kernel
Jiayuan Chen 869c63d597 bpf: Fix race in cpumap on PREEMPT_RT
On PREEMPT_RT kernels, the per-CPU xdp_bulk_queue (bq) can be accessed
concurrently by multiple preemptible tasks on the same CPU.

The original code assumes bq_enqueue() and __cpu_map_flush() run
atomically with respect to each other on the same CPU, relying on
local_bh_disable() to prevent preemption. However, on PREEMPT_RT,
local_bh_disable() only calls migrate_disable() (when
PREEMPT_RT_NEEDS_BH_LOCK is not set) and does not disable
preemption, which allows CFS scheduling to preempt a task during
bq_flush_to_queue(), enabling another task on the same CPU to enter
bq_enqueue() and operate on the same per-CPU bq concurrently.

This leads to several races:

1. Double __list_del_clearprev(): after bq->count is reset in
   bq_flush_to_queue(), a preempting task can call bq_enqueue() ->
   bq_flush_to_queue() on the same bq when bq->count reaches
   CPU_MAP_BULK_SIZE. Both tasks then call __list_del_clearprev()
   on the same bq->flush_node, the second call dereferences the
   prev pointer that was already set to NULL by the first.

2. bq->count and bq->q[] races: concurrent bq_enqueue() can corrupt
   the packet queue while bq_flush_to_queue() is processing it.

The race between task A (__cpu_map_flush -> bq_flush_to_queue) and
task B (bq_enqueue -> bq_flush_to_queue) on the same CPU:

  Task A (xdp_do_flush)          Task B (cpu_map_enqueue)
  ----------------------         ------------------------
  bq_flush_to_queue(bq)
    spin_lock(&q->producer_lock)
    /* flush bq->q[] to ptr_ring */
    bq->count = 0
    spin_unlock(&q->producer_lock)
                                   bq_enqueue(rcpu, xdpf)
    <-- CFS preempts Task A -->      bq->q[bq->count++] = xdpf
                                     /* ... more enqueues until full ... */
                                     bq_flush_to_queue(bq)
                                       spin_lock(&q->producer_lock)
                                       /* flush to ptr_ring */
                                       spin_unlock(&q->producer_lock)
                                       __list_del_clearprev(flush_node)
                                         /* sets flush_node.prev = NULL */
    <-- Task A resumes -->
    __list_del_clearprev(flush_node)
      flush_node.prev->next = ...
      /* prev is NULL -> kernel oops */

Fix this by adding a local_lock_t to xdp_bulk_queue and acquiring it
in bq_enqueue() and __cpu_map_flush(). These paths already run under
local_bh_disable(), so use local_lock_nested_bh() which on non-RT is
a pure annotation with no overhead, and on PREEMPT_RT provides a
per-CPU sleeping lock that serializes access to the bq.

To reproduce, insert an mdelay(100) between bq->count = 0 and
__list_del_clearprev() in bq_flush_to_queue(), then run reproducer
provided by syzkaller.

Fixes: 3253cb49cb ("softirq: Allow to drop the softirq-BKL lock on PREEMPT_RT")
Reported-by: syzbot+2b3391f44313b3983e91@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/69369331.a70a0220.38f243.009d.GAE@google.com/T/
Reviewed-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Jiayuan Chen <jiayuan.chen@shopee.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiayuan Chen <jiayuan.chen@linux.dev>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260225121459.183121-2-jiayuan.chen@linux.dev
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2026-02-27 16:07:14 -08:00
..
2026-02-27 16:07:14 -08:00
2026-01-05 16:43:34 +01:00
2025-11-11 10:01:31 +01:00
2025-11-04 08:30:50 +01:00
2026-01-22 11:11:20 +01:00
2025-10-29 10:29:54 +01:00
2026-01-26 19:07:13 -08:00