The "ocelot" and "seville" tagging protocols populate a bit mask for the
TX ports, so we can use dsa_xmit_port_mask() to centralize the decision
of how to set that field.
This protocol used BIT_ULL() rather than simple BIT() to silence Smatch,
as explained in commit 1f778d500d ("net: mscc: ocelot: avoid type
promotion when calling ocelot_ifh_set_dest"). I would expect that this
tool no longer complains now, when the BIT(dp->index) is hidden inside
the dsa_xmit_port_mask() function, the return value of which is promoted
to u64.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251127120902.292555-9-vladimir.oltean@nxp.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
5733fe2a7a