mirror of
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2026-08-03 12:14:30 -04:00
Test that when the hash policy is set to custom, traffic is distributed only according to the inner fields set in the fib_multipath_hash_fields sysctl. Each time set a different field and make sure traffic is only distributed when the field is changed in the packet stream. The test only verifies the behavior of IPv4/IPv6 overlays on top of an IPv6 underlay network. The previous patch verified the same with an IPv4 underlay network. Example output: # ./ip6gre_custom_multipath_hash.sh TEST: ping [ OK ] TEST: ping6 [ OK ] INFO: Running IPv4 overlay custom multipath hash tests TEST: Multipath hash field: Inner source IP (balanced) [ OK ] INFO: Packets sent on path1 / path2: 6602 / 6002 TEST: Multipath hash field: Inner source IP (unbalanced) [ OK ] INFO: Packets sent on path1 / path2: 1 / 12601 TEST: Multipath hash field: Inner destination IP (balanced) [ OK ] INFO: Packets sent on path1 / path2: 6802 / 5801 TEST: Multipath hash field: Inner destination IP (unbalanced) [ OK ] INFO: Packets sent on path1 / path2: 12602 / 3 TEST: Multipath hash field: Inner source port (balanced) [ OK ] INFO: Packets sent on path1 / path2: 16431 / 16344 TEST: Multipath hash field: Inner source port (unbalanced) [ OK ] INFO: Packets sent on path1 / path2: 0 / 32773 TEST: Multipath hash field: Inner destination port (balanced) [ OK ] INFO: Packets sent on path1 / path2: 16431 / 16344 TEST: Multipath hash field: Inner destination port (unbalanced) [ OK ] INFO: Packets sent on path1 / path2: 2 / 32772 INFO: Running IPv6 overlay custom multipath hash tests TEST: Multipath hash field: Inner source IP (balanced) [ OK ] INFO: Packets sent on path1 / path2: 6704 / 5902 TEST: Multipath hash field: Inner source IP (unbalanced) [ OK ] INFO: Packets sent on path1 / path2: 1 / 12600 TEST: Multipath hash field: Inner destination IP (balanced) [ OK ] INFO: Packets sent on path1 / path2: 5751 / 6852 TEST: Multipath hash field: Inner destination IP (unbalanced) [ OK ] INFO: Packets sent on path1 / path2: 12602 / 0 TEST: Multipath hash field: Inner flowlabel (balanced) [ OK ] INFO: Packets sent on path1 / path2: 8272 / 8181 TEST: Multipath hash field: Inner flowlabel (unbalanced) [ OK ] INFO: Packets sent on path1 / path2: 3 / 12602 TEST: Multipath hash field: Inner source port (balanced) [ OK ] INFO: Packets sent on path1 / path2: 16424 / 16351 TEST: Multipath hash field: Inner source port (unbalanced) [ OK ] INFO: Packets sent on path1 / path2: 3 / 32774 TEST: Multipath hash field: Inner destination port (balanced) [ OK ] INFO: Packets sent on path1 / path2: 16425 / 16350 TEST: Multipath hash field: Inner destination port (unbalanced) [ OK ] INFO: Packets sent on path1 / path2: 2 / 32773 Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com> Acked-by: David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Motivation
==========
One of the nice things about network namespaces is that they allow one
to easily create and test complex environments.
Unfortunately, these namespaces can not be used with actual switching
ASICs, as their ports can not be migrated to other network namespaces
(NETIF_F_NETNS_LOCAL) and most of them probably do not support the
L1-separation provided by namespaces.
However, a similar kind of flexibility can be achieved by using VRFs and
by looping the switch ports together. For example:
br0
+
vrf-h1 | vrf-h2
+ +---+----+ +
| | | |
192.0.2.1/24 + + + + 192.0.2.2/24
swp1 swp2 swp3 swp4
+ + + +
| | | |
+--------+ +--------+
The VRFs act as lightweight namespaces representing hosts connected to
the switch.
This approach for testing switch ASICs has several advantages over the
traditional method that requires multiple physical machines, to name a
few:
1. Only the device under test (DUT) is being tested without noise from
other system.
2. Ability to easily provision complex topologies. Testing bridging
between 4-ports LAGs or 8-way ECMP requires many physical links that are
not always available. With the VRF-based approach one merely needs to
loopback more ports.
These tests are written with switch ASICs in mind, but they can be run
on any Linux box using veth pairs to emulate physical loopbacks.
Guidelines for Writing Tests
============================
o Where possible, reuse an existing topology for different tests instead
of recreating the same topology.
o Tests that use anything but the most trivial topologies should include
an ASCII art showing the topology.
o Where possible, IPv6 and IPv4 addresses shall conform to RFC 3849 and
RFC 5737, respectively.
o Where possible, tests shall be written so that they can be reused by
multiple topologies and added to lib.sh.
o Checks shall be added to lib.sh for any external dependencies.
o Code shall be checked using ShellCheck [1] prior to submission.
1. https://www.shellcheck.net/