Files
linux/Documentation
Andrew Murray 44280690ce Documentation: preempt-locking: Use better example
The existing wording implies that the use of spin_unlock whilst irqs are
disabled might trigger a reschedule. However the preemptible() test in
preempt_schedule will prevent a reschedule if irqs are disabled.

Lets improve the clarity of this wording to change the example from
spin_unlock to cond_resched() and cond_resched_lock() as these are
functions that will trigger a reschedule if the preempt count is 0 without
testing that irqs are disabled.

Also remove the 'Last Updated' line as this is not up to date and better
tracked via GIT.

Signed-off-by: Andrew Murray <andrew.murray@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2018-10-12 11:35:47 -06:00
..
2018-08-24 14:46:43 +02:00
2018-07-17 15:33:47 +02:00
2018-03-06 17:26:15 +01:00
2018-03-26 12:13:21 -04:00
2017-05-16 08:44:18 -03:00
2018-03-26 15:57:04 +02:00
2017-12-16 22:37:12 -08:00
2017-08-19 11:02:53 -07:00
2017-07-14 13:51:34 -06:00
2017-07-14 13:51:42 -06:00
2017-07-14 13:51:43 -06:00
2017-07-14 13:51:43 -06:00
2017-07-14 13:51:45 -06:00
2017-07-14 13:51:45 -06:00
2017-07-14 13:51:46 -06:00
2017-07-14 13:57:58 -06:00
2017-07-14 13:57:59 -06:00
2017-07-06 08:23:30 +02:00
2017-07-14 13:58:04 -06:00
2017-07-14 13:58:14 -06:00
2018-05-08 09:16:41 -06:00
2017-07-14 13:58:11 -06:00