The Cypress touchscreen controllers are often used with external pull-up
for the interrupt line and the I2C lines, so we might need to enable
a regulator to bring the lines into usable state. Otherwise, this might
cause spurious interrupts and reading from I2C will fail.
Implement support for a "vddio-supply" that is enabled by the cyttsp5
driver so that the regulator gets enabled when needed.
Signed-off-by: Lin, Meng-Bo <linmengbo0689@protonmail.com>
Acked-by: Alistair Francis <alistair@alistair23.me>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221117190507.87535-3-linmengbo0689@protonmail.com
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Acked-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230920125829.1478827-53-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Acked-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230920125829.1478827-52-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230920125829.1478827-51-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Acked-by: Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230920125829.1478827-50-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230920125829.1478827-49-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230920125829.1478827-48-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230920125829.1478827-47-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230920125829.1478827-46-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new() which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230920125829.1478827-45-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
MELFAS MMS114 and similar touchscreens have support for touch keys.
Enable support of them in the driver. The keycodes to emit can be
controlled by the linux,keycodes DT property.
Sidenote - the MAX_TOUCHKEYS value is set to 15, as that's the
maximum value that the ID field can contain. I don't have access
to any datasheets that could confirm or deny whether this is accurate.
Most downstream drivers I've been able to find only use up to 2 keys
(though I did find a driver that mentioned up to 4, but only 2 were
used). They don't have any checks for a maximum keycode value, it is
just extracted from the ID bits (0xf mask).
The drivers I've been able to find also don't use touch ID 0; I assume
that it is never used, so the keycodes provided in the DT start from
touch ID 1. I suppose this is in-line with the regular behavior
for touch IDs in touchscreen events, as there the provided touch ID
is always lowered by 1, which would cause an overflow if it was 0...
Just in case, we quietly return if the touch ID is set to 0 here.
The implementation of the linux,keycodes property handling code was
adapted from the msg2638 driver.
Signed-off-by: Artur Weber <aweber.kernel@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230714100424.29798-3-aweber.kernel@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
The DT of_device.h and of_platform.h date back to the separate
of_platform_bus_type before it as merged into the regular platform bus.
As part of that merge prepping Arm DT support 13 years ago, they
"temporarily" include each other. They also include platform_device.h
and of.h. As a result, there's a pretty much random mix of those include
files used throughout the tree. In order to detangle these headers and
replace the implicit includes with struct declarations, users need to
explicitly include the correct includes.
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230714174633.4058096-1-robh@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
