Patch series "selftests/mm: Implement support for arm64 on va".
The va_128TBswitch selftest is designed and implemented for PowerPC and
x86 architectures which support a 128TB switch, up to 256TB of virtual
address space and hugepage sizes of 16MB and 2MB respectively. Arm64
platforms on the other hand support a 256Tb switch, up to 4PB of virtual
address space and a default hugepage size of 512MB when 64k pagesize is
enabled.
These architectural differences require introducing support for arm64
platforms, after which a more generic naming convention is suggested. The
in code comments are amended to provide a more platform independent
explanation of the working of the code and nr_hugepages are configured as
required. Finally, the file running the testcase is modified in order to
prevent skipping of hugetlb testcases of va_high_addr_switch.
This patch (of 5):
Arm64 platforms have the ability to support 64kb pagesize, 512MB default
hugepage size and up to 4PB of virtual address space. The address switch
occurs at 256TB as opposed to 128TB. Hence, the necessary support has
been added.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230323105243.2807166-1-chaitanyas.prakash@arm.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230323105243.2807166-2-chaitanyas.prakash@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Chaitanya S Prakash <chaitanyas.prakash@arm.com>
Cc: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
The userfaultfd stress test never tested private shmem, which I think was
overlooked long due. Add it so it matches with uffd unit test and it'll
cover all memory supported with the three memory types.
Meanwhile, rename the memory types a bit. Considering shared mem is the
major use case for both shmem / hugetlbfs, changing from:
anon, hugetlb, hugetlb_shared, shmem
To (with shmem-private added):
anon, hugetlb, hugetlb-private, shmem, shmem-private
Add the shmem-private to run_vmtests.sh too.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230412164546.329355-1-peterx@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Dmitry Safonov <0x7f454c46@gmail.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <rppt@kernel.org>
Cc: Zach O'Keefe <zokeefe@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
With the new uffd unit test covering the /dev/userfaultfd path and syscall
path of uffd initializations, we can safely drop the devnode test in the
old stress test.
One thing is to avoid duplication of running the stress test twice which is
an overkill to only test the /dev/ interface in run_vmtests.sh.
The other benefit is now all uffd tests (that uses userfaultfd_open) can
run automatically as long as any type of interface is enabled (either
syscall or dev), so it's more likely to succeed rather than fail due to
unprivilege.
With this patch lands, we can drop all the "mem_type:XXX" handlings too.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230412164525.329176-1-peterx@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Dmitry Safonov <0x7f454c46@gmail.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <rppt@kernel.org>
Cc: Zach O'Keefe <zokeefe@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Move the two tests into the unit test, and convert it into 20 standalone
tests:
- events test on all 5 mem types, with wp on/off
- signal test on all 5 mem types, with wp on/off
Testing sigbus on anon... done
Testing sigbus on shmem... done
Testing sigbus on shmem-private... done
Testing sigbus on hugetlb... done
Testing sigbus on hugetlb-private... done
Testing sigbus-wp on anon... done
Testing sigbus-wp on shmem... done
Testing sigbus-wp on shmem-private... done
Testing sigbus-wp on hugetlb... done
Testing sigbus-wp on hugetlb-private... done
Testing events on anon... done
Testing events on shmem... done
Testing events on shmem-private... done
Testing events on hugetlb... done
Testing events on hugetlb-private... done
Testing events-wp on anon... done
Testing events-wp on shmem... done
Testing events-wp on shmem-private... done
Testing events-wp on hugetlb... done
Testing events-wp on hugetlb-private... done
It'll also remove a lot of global references along the way,
e.g. test_uffdio_wp will be replaced with the wp value passed over.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230412164400.328798-1-peterx@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Dmitry Safonov <0x7f454c46@gmail.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <rppt@kernel.org>
Cc: Zach O'Keefe <zokeefe@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
This moves the minor test to the new unit test.
Rewrite the content check with char* opeartions to avoid fiddling with
my_bcmp().
Drop global vars test_uffdio_minor and test_collapse, just assume test them
always in common code for now.
OTOH make this single test into five tests:
- minor test on [shmem, hugetlb] with wp=false
- minor test on [shmem, hugetlb] with wp=true
- minor test + collapse on shmem only
One thing to mention that we used to test COLLAPSE+WP but that doesn't
sound right at all. It's possible it's silently broken but unnoticed
because COLLAPSE is not part of the default test suite.
Make the MADV_COLLAPSE test fail-able (by skip it when failing), because
it's not guaranteed to success anyway.
Drop a bunch of useless code after the move, because the unit test always
use aligned num of pages and has nothing to do with n_cpus.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230412164357.328779-1-peterx@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: Zach O'Keefe <zokeefe@google.com>
Cc: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Dmitry Safonov <0x7f454c46@gmail.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <rppt@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Add two helpers to register/unregister to an uffd. Use them to drop
duplicate codes.
This patch also drops assert_expected_ioctls_present() and
get_expected_ioctls(). Reasons:
- It'll need a lot of effort to pass test_type==HUGETLB into it from
the upper, so it's the simplest way to get rid of another global var
- The ioctls returned in UFFDIO_REGISTER is hardly useful at all,
because any app can already detect kernel support on any ioctl via its
corresponding UFFD_FEATURE_*. The check here is for sanity mostly but
it's probably destined no user app will even use it.
- It's not friendly to one future goal of uffd to run on old
kernels, the problem is get_expected_ioctls() compiles against
UFFD_API_RANGE_IOCTLS, which is a value that can change depending on
where the test is compiled, rather than reflecting what the kernel
underneath has. It means it'll report false negatives on old kernels
so it's against our will.
So let's make our lives easier.
[peterx@redhat.com; tools/testing/selftests/mm/hugepage-mremap.c: add headers]
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/ZDxrvZh/cw357D8P@x1n
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230412164247.328293-1-peterx@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Dmitry Safonov <0x7f454c46@gmail.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <rppt@kernel.org>
Cc: Zach O'Keefe <zokeefe@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
In many ways it's weird and unwanted to keep all the tests in the same
userfaultfd.c at least when still in the current way.
For example, it doesn't make much sense to run the stress test for each
method we can create an userfaultfd handle (either via syscall or /dev/
node). It's a waste of time running this twice for the whole stress as
the stress paths are the same, only the open path is different.
It's also just weird to need to manually specify different types of memory
to run all unit tests for the userfaultfd interface. We should be able to
just run a single program and that should go through all functional uffd
tests without running the stress test at all. The stress test was more
for torturing and finding race conditions. We don't want to wait for
stress to finish just to regress test a functional test.
When we start to pile up more things on top of the same file and same
functions, things start to go a bit chaos and the code is just harder to
maintain too with tons of global variables.
This patch creates a new test uffd-unit-tests to keep userfaultfd unit
tests in the future, currently empty.
Meanwhile rename the old userfaultfd.c test to uffd-stress.c.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230412164244.328270-1-peterx@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <rppt@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Dmitry Safonov <0x7f454c46@gmail.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Zach O'Keefe <zokeefe@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
The idea was trying to flip this var in the alarm handler from time to
time to test -EEXIST of UFFDIO_ZEROPAGE, but firstly it's only used in the
zeropage test so probably only used once, meanwhile we passed
"retry==false" so it'll never got tested anyway.
Drop both sides so we always test UFFDIO_ZEROPAGE retries if has_zeropage
is set (!hugetlb).
One more thing to do is doing UFFDIO_REGISTER for the alias buffer too,
because otherwise the test won't even pass! We were just lucky that this
test never really got ran at all.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230412164238.328238-1-peterx@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <rppt@kernel.org>
Cc: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>
Cc: Dmitry Safonov <0x7f454c46@gmail.com>
Cc: Zach O'Keefe <zokeefe@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Patch series "selftests/mm: Split / Refactor userfault test", v2.
This patchset splits userfaultfd.c into two tests:
- uffd-stress: the "vanilla", old and powerful stress test
- uffd-unit-tests: all the unit tests will be moved here
This is on my todo list for a long time but I never did it for real. The
uffd test is growing into a small and cute monster. I start to notice it's
going harder to maintain such a test and make it useful.
A few issues I found when looking at userfaultfd test:
- We have a bunch of unit tests in userfaultfd.c, but they always need to
be run only after a stress type. No way to not do it.
- We can only run an unit test for one memory type only, if we want to
do a quick smoke test to check regressions, there's no good way. The
best to come currently is "bash ./run_vmtests.sh -t userfaultfd" thanks
to the most recent changes to run_vmtests.sh on tagging. Still, that
needs to run the stress tests always and hard to see what's wrong.
- It's hard to add a new unit test to userfaultfd.c, we don't really know
what's happening, not until we mostly read the whole file.
- We did a bunch of useless tests, e.g. we run twice the whole suite of
stress test just to verify both syscall and /dev/userfaultfd. They're
all using userfaultfd_new() to create the handle, everything should
really be the same underneath. One simple unit test should cover that!
- We have tens of global variables in one file but shared with all the
tests. Some of them are not suitable to be a global var from
maintainance pov. It enforces every unit test to consider how these
vars affects the stress test and vice versa, but that's logically not
necessary.
- Userfaultfd test is not friendly to old kernels. Mostly it only works
on the latest kernel tree. It's preferrable to be run on all kernels
and properly report what's missing.
I'll stop here, I feel like I can still list some..
This patchset should resolve all issues above, and actually we can do even
more on top. I stopped doing that until I found I already got 29 patches
and 2000+ LOC changes. That's already a patchset terrible enough so we
should move in small steps.
After the whole set applied, "./run_vmtests.sh -t userfaultfd" looks like
this:
===8<===
vm.nr_hugepages = 1024
-------------------------
running ./uffd-unit-tests
-------------------------
Testing UFFDIO_API (with syscall)... done
Testing UFFDIO_API (with /dev/userfaultfd)... done
Testing register-ioctls on anon... done
Testing register-ioctls on shmem... done
Testing register-ioctls on shmem-private... done
Testing register-ioctls on hugetlb... done
Testing register-ioctls on hugetlb-private... done
Testing zeropage on anon... done
Testing zeropage on shmem... done
Testing zeropage on shmem-private... done
Testing zeropage on hugetlb... done
Testing zeropage on hugetlb-private... done
Testing pagemap on anon... done
Testing wp-unpopulated on anon... done
Testing minor on shmem... done
Testing minor on hugetlb... done
Testing minor-wp on shmem... done
Testing minor-wp on hugetlb... done
Testing minor-collapse on shmem... done
Testing sigbus on anon... done
Testing sigbus on shmem... done
Testing sigbus on shmem-private... done
Testing sigbus on hugetlb... done
Testing sigbus on hugetlb-private... done
Testing sigbus-wp on anon... done
Testing sigbus-wp on shmem... done
Testing sigbus-wp on shmem-private... done
Testing sigbus-wp on hugetlb... done
Testing sigbus-wp on hugetlb-private... done
Testing events on anon... done
Testing events on shmem... done
Testing events on shmem-private... done
Testing events on hugetlb... done
Testing events on hugetlb-private... done
Testing events-wp on anon... done
Testing events-wp on shmem... done
Testing events-wp on shmem-private... done
Testing events-wp on hugetlb... done
Testing events-wp on hugetlb-private... done
Userfaults unit tests: pass=39, skip=0, fail=0 (total=39)
[PASS]
--------------------------------
running ./uffd-stress anon 20 16
--------------------------------
nr_pages: 5120, nr_pages_per_cpu: 640
bounces: 15, mode: rnd racing ver poll, userfaults: 345 missing (26+48+61+102+30+12+59+7) 1596 wp (120+139+317+346+215+67+306+86)
[...]
[PASS]
------------------------------------
running ./uffd-stress hugetlb 128 32
------------------------------------
nr_pages: 64, nr_pages_per_cpu: 8
bounces: 31, mode: rnd racing ver poll, userfaults: 29 missing (6+6+6+5+4+2+0+0) 104 wp (20+19+22+18+7+12+5+1)
[...]
[PASS]
--------------------------------------------
running ./uffd-stress hugetlb-private 128 32
--------------------------------------------
nr_pages: 64, nr_pages_per_cpu: 8
bounces: 31, mode: rnd racing ver poll, userfaults: 33 missing (12+9+7+0+5+0+0+0) 111 wp (24+25+14+14+11+17+5+1)
[...]
[PASS]
---------------------------------
running ./uffd-stress shmem 20 16
---------------------------------
nr_pages: 5120, nr_pages_per_cpu: 640
bounces: 15, mode: rnd racing ver poll, userfaults: 247 missing (15+17+34+60+81+37+3+0) 2038 wp (180+114+276+400+381+318+165+204)
[...]
[PASS]
-----------------------------------------
running ./uffd-stress shmem-private 20 16
-----------------------------------------
nr_pages: 5120, nr_pages_per_cpu: 640
bounces: 15, mode: rnd racing ver poll, userfaults: 235 missing (52+29+55+56+13+9+16+5) 2849 wp (218+406+461+531+328+284+430+191)
[...]
[PASS]
SUMMARY: PASS=6 SKIP=0 FAIL=0
===8<===
The output may be different if we miss some features (e.g., hugetlb not
allocated, old kernel, less privilege of uffd handle), but they should show
up with good reasons. E.g., I tried to run the unit test on my Fedora
kernel and it gives me:
===8<===
UFFDIO_API (with syscall)... failed [reason: UFFDIO_API should fail with wrong api but didn't]
UFFDIO_API (with /dev/userfaultfd)... skipped [reason: cannot open userfaultfd handle]
zeropage on anon... done
zeropage on shmem... done
zeropage on shmem-private... done
zeropage-hugetlb on hugetlb... done
zeropage-hugetlb on hugetlb-private... done
pagemap on anon... pagemap on anon... pagemap on anon... done
wp-unpopulated on anon... skipped [reason: feature missing]
minor on shmem... done
minor on hugetlb... done
minor-wp on shmem... skipped [reason: feature missing]
minor-wp on hugetlb... skipped [reason: feature missing]
minor-collapse on shmem... done
sigbus on anon... skipped [reason: possible lack of priviledge]
sigbus on shmem... skipped [reason: possible lack of priviledge]
sigbus on shmem-private... skipped [reason: possible lack of priviledge]
sigbus on hugetlb... skipped [reason: possible lack of priviledge]
sigbus on hugetlb-private... skipped [reason: possible lack of priviledge]
sigbus-wp on anon... skipped [reason: possible lack of priviledge]
sigbus-wp on shmem... skipped [reason: possible lack of priviledge]
sigbus-wp on shmem-private... skipped [reason: possible lack of priviledge]
sigbus-wp on hugetlb... skipped [reason: possible lack of priviledge]
sigbus-wp on hugetlb-private... skipped [reason: possible lack of priviledge]
events on anon... skipped [reason: possible lack of priviledge]
events on shmem... skipped [reason: possible lack of priviledge]
events on shmem-private... skipped [reason: possible lack of priviledge]
events on hugetlb... skipped [reason: possible lack of priviledge]
events on hugetlb-private... skipped [reason: possible lack of priviledge]
events-wp on anon... skipped [reason: possible lack of priviledge]
events-wp on shmem... skipped [reason: possible lack of priviledge]
events-wp on shmem-private... skipped [reason: possible lack of priviledge]
events-wp on hugetlb... skipped [reason: possible lack of priviledge]
events-wp on hugetlb-private... skipped [reason: possible lack of priviledge]
Userfaults unit tests: pass=9, skip=24, fail=1 (total=34)
===8<===
Patch layout:
- Revert "userfaultfd: don't fail on unrecognized features"
Something I found when I got the UFFDIO_API test below. Axel, I still
propose to revert it as a whole, but feel free to continue the discussion
from the original patch thread.
- selftests/mm: Update .gitignore with two missing tests
- selftests/mm: Dump a summary in run_vmtests.sh
- selftests/mm: Merge util.h into vm_util.h
- selftests/mm: Use TEST_GEN_PROGS where proper
- selftests/mm: Link vm_util.c always
- selftests/mm: Merge default_huge_page_size() into one
- selftests/mm: Use PM_* macros in vm_utils.h
- selftests/mm: Reuse pagemap_get_entry() in vm_util.h
- selftests/mm: Test UFFDIO_ZEROPAGE only when !hugetlb
- selftests/mm: Drop test_uffdio_zeropage_eexist
Until here, all cleanups here and there. I wanted to keep going, but I
found that maybe it'll take a few more days to split the test. Hence I
did a split starting from the next one, so we have a working thing first.
- selftests/mm: Create uffd-common.[ch]
- selftests/mm: Split uffd tests into uffd-stress and uffd-unit-tests
This did the major brute force split of common codes into
uffd-common.[ch]. That'll be the so far common base for stress and unit
tests. Then a new unit test is created.
- selftests/mm: uffd_[un]register()
- selftests/mm: uffd_open_{dev|sys}()
- selftests/mm: UFFDIO_API test
This patch hides here to start writting the 1st unit test with
UFFDIO_API, also detection of userfaultfd privileges.
- selftests/mm: Drop global mem_fd in uffd tests
- selftests/mm: Drop global hpage_size in uffd tests
- selftests/mm: Rename uffd_stats to uffd_args
- selftests/mm: Let uffd_handle_page_fault() takes wp parameter
- selftests/mm: Allow allocate_area() to fail properly
Some further cleanup that I noticed otherwise hard to move the tests.
- selftests/mm: Add framework for uffd-unit-test
The major patch provides the framework for most of the rest unit tests.
- selftests/mm: Move uffd pagemap test to unit test
- selftests/mm: Move uffd minor test to unit test
- selftests/mm: Move uffd sig/events tests into uffd unit tests
- selftests/mm: Move zeropage test into uffd unit tests
Move unit tests and suite them into the new file.
- selftests/mm: Workaround no way to detect uffd-minor + wp
- selftests/mm: Allow uffd test to skip properly with no privilege
- selftests/mm: Drop sys/dev test in uffd-stress test
- selftests/mm: Add shmem-private test to uffd-stress
A bunch of changes to do better on error reportings, and add
shmem-private to the stress test which was long missing.
- selftests/mm: Add uffdio register ioctls test
One more patch to test uffdio_register.ioctls.
This patch (of 30):
Update .gitignore with two missing tests.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230412163922.327282-1-peterx@redhat.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230412164114.327709-1-peterx@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <rppt@kernel.org>
Cc: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>
Cc: Dmitry Safonov <0x7f454c46@gmail.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Zach O'Keefe <zokeefe@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Let's add some tests that trigger (pte|pmd)_mkdirty on VMAs without write
permissions. If an architecture implementation is wrong, we might
accidentally set the PTE/PMD writable and allow for write access in a VMA
without write permissions.
The tests include reproducers for the two issues recently discovered
and worked-around in core-MM for now:
(1) commit 624a2c94f5 ("Partly revert "mm/thp: carry over dirty
bit when thp splits on pmd"")
(2) commit 96a9c287e2 ("mm/migrate: fix wrongly apply write bit
after mkdirty on sparc64")
In addition, some other tests that reveal further issues.
All tests pass under x86_64:
./mkdirty
# [INFO] detected THP size: 2048 KiB
TAP version 13
1..6
# [INFO] PTRACE write access
ok 1 SIGSEGV generated, page not modified
# [INFO] PTRACE write access to THP
ok 2 SIGSEGV generated, page not modified
# [INFO] Page migration
ok 3 SIGSEGV generated, page not modified
# [INFO] Page migration of THP
ok 4 SIGSEGV generated, page not modified
# [INFO] PTE-mapping a THP
ok 5 SIGSEGV generated, page not modified
# [INFO] UFFDIO_COPY
ok 6 SIGSEGV generated, page not modified
# Totals: pass:6 fail:0 xfail:0 xpass:0 skip:0 error:0
But some fail on sparc64:
./mkdirty
# [INFO] detected THP size: 8192 KiB
TAP version 13
1..6
# [INFO] PTRACE write access
not ok 1 SIGSEGV generated, page not modified
# [INFO] PTRACE write access to THP
not ok 2 SIGSEGV generated, page not modified
# [INFO] Page migration
ok 3 SIGSEGV generated, page not modified
# [INFO] Page migration of THP
ok 4 SIGSEGV generated, page not modified
# [INFO] PTE-mapping a THP
ok 5 SIGSEGV generated, page not modified
# [INFO] UFFDIO_COPY
not ok 6 SIGSEGV generated, page not modified
Bail out! 3 out of 6 tests failed
# Totals: pass:3 fail:3 xfail:0 xpass:0 skip:0 error:0
Reverting both above commits makes all tests fail on sparc64:
./mkdirty
# [INFO] detected THP size: 8192 KiB
TAP version 13
1..6
# [INFO] PTRACE write access
not ok 1 SIGSEGV generated, page not modified
# [INFO] PTRACE write access to THP
not ok 2 SIGSEGV generated, page not modified
# [INFO] Page migration
not ok 3 SIGSEGV generated, page not modified
# [INFO] Page migration of THP
not ok 4 SIGSEGV generated, page not modified
# [INFO] PTE-mapping a THP
not ok 5 SIGSEGV generated, page not modified
# [INFO] UFFDIO_COPY
not ok 6 SIGSEGV generated, page not modified
Bail out! 6 out of 6 tests failed
# Totals: pass:0 fail:6 xfail:0 xpass:0 skip:0 error:0
The tests are useful to detect other problematic archs, to verify new
arch fixes, and to stop such issues from reappearing in the future.
For now, we don't add any hugetlb tests.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230411142512.438404-3-david@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Patch series "mm: (pte|pmd)_mkdirty() should not unconditionally allow for
write access".
This is the follow-up on [1], adding selftests (testing for known issues
we added workarounds for and other issues that haven't been fixed yet),
fixing sparc64, reverting the workarounds, and perform one cleanup.
The patch from [1] was modified slightly (updated/extended patch
description, dropped one unnecessary NOP instruction from the ASM in
__pte_mkhwwrite()).
Retested on x86_64 and sparc64 (sun4u in QEMU).
I scanned most architectures to make sure their (pte|pmd)_mkdirty()
handling is correct. To be sure, we can run the selftests and find out if
other architectures are still affectes (loongarch was fixed recently as
well).
Based on master for now. I don't expect surprises regarding mm-tress, but
I can rebase if there are any problems.
This patch (of 6):
The COW selftest can deal with THP not being configured. So move error
handling of read_pmd_pagesize() into the callers such that we can reuse it
in the COW selftest.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230411142512.438404-1-david@redhat.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221212130213.136267-1-david@redhat.com [1]
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230411142512.438404-2-david@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To make it easier for bleeding-edge BPF applications, such as sched_ext,
to utilize open-coded iterators, move bpf_for(), bpf_for_each(), and
bpf_repeat() macros from selftests/bpf-internal bpf_misc.h helper, to
libbpf-provided bpf_helpers.h header.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230418002148.3255690-6-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Due to broken iowait task counting design (cf: comments above
get_cpu_idle_time_us() and nr_iowait()), it is not possible to provide
the guarantee that /proc/stat or /proc/uptime display monotonic idle
time values.
Remove the assertions that verify the related wrong assumption so that
testers and maintainers don't spend more time on that.
Reported-by: Yu Liao <liaoyu15@huawei.com>
Reported-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230222144649.624380-8-frederic@kernel.org
Most of the code had an issue according to ShellCheck.
That's mainly due to the fact it incorrectly believes most of the code
was unreachable because it's invoked by variable name, see how the
"tests" array is used.
Once SC2317 has been ignored, three small warnings were still visible:
- SC2155: Declare and assign separately to avoid masking return values.
- SC2046: Quote this to prevent word splitting: can be ignored because
"ip netns pids" can display more than one pid.
- SC2166: Prefer [ p ] || [ q ] as [ p -o q ] is not well defined.
This probably didn't fix any actual issues but it might help spotting
new interesting warnings reported by ShellCheck as just before,
ShellCheck was reporting issues for most lines making it a bit useless.
Signed-off-by: Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@tessares.net>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
mptcp_connect tool was printing some duplicated entries when showing how
to use it: -j -l -r
While at it, I also:
- moved the very few entries that were not sorted,
- added -R that was missing since
commit 8a4b910d00 ("mptcp: selftests: add rcvbuf set option"),
- removed the -u parameter that has been removed in
commit f730b65c9d ("selftests: mptcp: try to set mptcp ulp mode in different sk states").
No need to backport this, it is just an internal tool used by our
selftests. The help menu is mainly useful for MPTCP kernel devs.
Acked-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@tessares.net>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
The upcall socket interface can be exercised now to make sure that
future feature adjustments to the field can maintain backwards
compatibility.
Signed-off-by: Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Add a basic set of fields to print in a 'dpflow' format. This will be
used by future commits to check for flow fields after parsing, as
well as verifying the flow fields pushed into the kernel from
userspace.
Signed-off-by: Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Includes an associated test to generate netns and connect
interfaces, with the option to include packet tracing.
This will be used in the future when flow support is added
for additional test cases.
Signed-off-by: Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
We've managed to improve the UX for kptrs significantly over the last 9
months. All of the prior main use cases, struct bpf_cpumask *, struct
task_struct *, and struct cgroup *, have all been updated to be
synchronized mainly using RCU. In other words, their KF_ACQUIRE kfunc
calls are all KF_RCU, and the pointers themselves are MEM_RCU and can be
accessed in an RCU read region in BPF.
In a follow-on change, we'll be removing the KF_KPTR_GET kfunc flag.
This patch prepares for that by removing the
bpf_kfunc_call_test_kptr_get() kfunc, and all associated selftests.
Signed-off-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230416084928.326135-2-void@manifault.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Test refcounted local kptr functionality added in previous patches in
the series.
Usecases which pass verification:
* Add refcounted local kptr to both tree and list. Then, read and -
possibly, depending on test variant - delete from tree, then list.
* Also test doing read-and-maybe-delete in opposite order
* Stash a refcounted local kptr in a map_value, then add it to a
rbtree. Read from both, possibly deleting after tree read.
* Add refcounted local kptr to both tree and list. Then, try reading and
deleting twice from one of the collections.
* bpf_refcount_acquire of just-added non-owning ref should work, as
should bpf_refcount_acquire of owning ref just out of bpf_obj_new
Usecases which fail verification:
* The simple successful bpf_refcount_acquire cases from above should
both fail to verify if the newly-acquired owning ref is not dropped
Signed-off-by: Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230415201811.343116-10-davemarchevsky@fb.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
