Add the msm_disp_snapshot module which adds supports to dump dpu
registers and capture the drm atomic state which can be used in
case of error conditions.
changes in v5:
- start storing disp_state in msm_kms instead of dpu_kms
- get rid of MSM_DISP_SNAPSHOT_IN_* enum by simplifying the functions
- move snprintf inside the snapshot core by using varargs
- get rid of some stale code comments
- allow snapshot module for non-DPU targets
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Abhinav Kumar <abhinavk@codeaurora.org>
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1618606645-19695-3-git-send-email-abhinavk@codeaurora.org
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
irq_hpd interrupt should be handled after dongle plugged in and
before dongle unplugged. Hence irq_hpd interrupt is enabled at
the end of the plugin handle and disabled at the beginning of
unplugged handle. Current irq_hpd with sink_count = 0 is wrongly
handled same as the dongle unplugged which tears down the mainlink
and disables the phy. This patch fixes this problem by only tearing
down the mainlink but keeping phy enabled at irq_hpd with
sink_count = 0 handle so that next irq_hpd with sink_count =1 can be
handled by setup mainlink only. This patch also set dongle into D3
(power off) state at end of handling irq_hpd with sink_count = 0.
Changes in v2:
-- add ctrl->phy_Power_count
Changes in v3:
-- del ctrl->phy_Power_count
-- add phy_power_off to dp_ctrl_off_link_stream()
Changes in v4:
-- return immediately if clock disable failed at dp_ctrl_off_link_stream()
Changes in v5:
-- set dongle to D3 (power off) state at dp_ctrl_off_link_stream()
Changes in v6:
-- add Fixes tag
Fixes: ea9f337ce8 ("drm/msm/dp: reset dp controller only at boot up and pm_resume")
Signed-off-by: Kuogee Hsieh <khsieh@codeaurora.org>
Tested-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1621635930-30161-1-git-send-email-khsieh@codeaurora.org
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
No need for a separate flag now that DCN3.1 is not in bring up.
Fold into DRM_AMD_DC_DCN like previous DCN IPs.
Reviewed-by: Nicholas Kazlauskas <nicholas.kazlauskas@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Function radeon_fence_driver_init always returns success,
the function type maybe coule be changed to void.
This patch first delete the check of the return
value of the function call radeon_fence_driver_init, then,
optimise the function declaration and function to void type.
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Bernard Zhao <bernard@vivo.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
This reverts commit 1815d9c86e.
Unfortunately this inverts the locking hierarchy, so back to the
drawing board. Full lockdep splat below:
======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
5.13.0-rc7-CI-CI_DRM_10254+ #1 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
kms_frontbuffer/1087 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff88810dcd01a8 (&dev->master_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: drm_is_current_master+0x1b/0x40
but task is already holding lock:
ffff88810dcd0488 (&dev->mode_config.mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: drm_mode_getconnector+0x1c6/0x4a0
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #2 (&dev->mode_config.mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
__mutex_lock+0xab/0x970
drm_client_modeset_probe+0x22e/0xca0
__drm_fb_helper_initial_config_and_unlock+0x42/0x540
intel_fbdev_initial_config+0xf/0x20 [i915]
async_run_entry_fn+0x28/0x130
process_one_work+0x26d/0x5c0
worker_thread+0x37/0x380
kthread+0x144/0x170
ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30
-> #1 (&client->modeset_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
__mutex_lock+0xab/0x970
drm_client_modeset_commit_locked+0x1c/0x180
drm_client_modeset_commit+0x1c/0x40
__drm_fb_helper_restore_fbdev_mode_unlocked+0x88/0xb0
drm_fb_helper_set_par+0x34/0x40
intel_fbdev_set_par+0x11/0x40 [i915]
fbcon_init+0x270/0x4f0
visual_init+0xc6/0x130
do_bind_con_driver+0x1e5/0x2d0
do_take_over_console+0x10e/0x180
do_fbcon_takeover+0x53/0xb0
register_framebuffer+0x22d/0x310
__drm_fb_helper_initial_config_and_unlock+0x36c/0x540
intel_fbdev_initial_config+0xf/0x20 [i915]
async_run_entry_fn+0x28/0x130
process_one_work+0x26d/0x5c0
worker_thread+0x37/0x380
kthread+0x144/0x170
ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30
-> #0 (&dev->master_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
__lock_acquire+0x151e/0x2590
lock_acquire+0xd1/0x3d0
__mutex_lock+0xab/0x970
drm_is_current_master+0x1b/0x40
drm_mode_getconnector+0x37e/0x4a0
drm_ioctl_kernel+0xa8/0xf0
drm_ioctl+0x1e8/0x390
__x64_sys_ioctl+0x6a/0xa0
do_syscall_64+0x39/0xb0
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
other info that might help us debug this:
Chain exists of: &dev->master_mutex --> &client->modeset_mutex --> &dev->mode_config.mutex
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(&dev->mode_config.mutex);
lock(&client->modeset_mutex);
lock(&dev->mode_config.mutex);
lock(&dev->master_mutex);
*** DEADLOCK ***
1 lock held by kms_frontbuffer/1087:
#0: ffff88810dcd0488 (&dev->mode_config.mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: drm_mode_getconnector+0x1c6/0x4a0
stack backtrace:
CPU: 7 PID: 1087 Comm: kms_frontbuffer Not tainted 5.13.0-rc7-CI-CI_DRM_10254+ #1
Hardware name: Intel Corporation Ice Lake Client Platform/IceLake U DDR4 SODIMM PD RVP TLC, BIOS ICLSFWR1.R00.3234.A01.1906141750 06/14/2019
Call Trace:
dump_stack+0x7f/0xad
check_noncircular+0x12e/0x150
__lock_acquire+0x151e/0x2590
lock_acquire+0xd1/0x3d0
__mutex_lock+0xab/0x970
drm_is_current_master+0x1b/0x40
drm_mode_getconnector+0x37e/0x4a0
drm_ioctl_kernel+0xa8/0xf0
drm_ioctl+0x1e8/0x390
__x64_sys_ioctl+0x6a/0xa0
do_syscall_64+0x39/0xb0
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
Note that this broke the intel-gfx CI pretty much across the board
because it has to reboot machines after it hits a lockdep splat.
Testcase: igt/debugfs_test/read_all_entries
Acked-by: Petri Latvala <petri.latvala@intel.com>
Fixes: 1815d9c86e ("drm: add a locked version of drm_is_current_master")
Cc: Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi <desmondcheongzx@gmail.com>
Cc: Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov@gmail.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>
Cc: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
Cc: David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210622075409.2673805-1-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch
[Why]
After panel power up, if PSR entry attempted too early,
PSR state may get stuck in transition.
This could happen if the panel is not ready
to respond to the SDP PSR entry message.
In this case dmub f/w is unable to abort PSR entry
since abortion is not permitted after the SDP has been sent.
[How]
Skip 5 pageflips before PSR enable.
Signed-off-by: Roman Li <roman.li@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Hersen Wu <hersenxs.wu@amd.com>
Acked-by: Bindu Ramamurthy <bindu.r@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[why]
Some SOC BB paramters may vary per SKU, and it does
not make sense for driver to hardcode these values.
This change was added for dcn30 and dcn301, but not
for dcn302 and dcn303
[how]
Parse the values from VBIOS if available, and use
them if valid
Fixes: 93669c8e48 ("drm/amd/display: get socBB from VBIOS")
Signed-off-by: Aurabindo Pillai <aurabindo.pillai@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Siqueira <Rodrigo.Siqueira@amd.com>
Acked-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Acked-by: Bindu Ramamurthy <bindu.r@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[Why]
The voltage swing has to start from the minimum level when transmit TPS1 over
Main-Link in clock recovery sequence.
The lane settings from current design will inherit the existing VS/PE values
that could be adjusted by Repeater X, and to use the adjusted voltage swing level
in Repeater X-1 or DPRX could violate DP specs.
[How]
To reset VS from lane settings after LTTPRs have been trained to meet the requirement.
Signed-off-by: Martin Tsai <martin.tsai@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Wenjing Liu <Wenjing.Liu@amd.com>
Acked-by: Bindu Ramamurthy <bindu.r@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[why]
Some timings with a large VBlank cause the value to overflow the
register related, while also producing other wrong values in DML output.
[how]
Clamp VStartup at the DCN3.1 maximum value
Signed-off-by: Nikola Cornij <nikola.cornij@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Dmytro Laktyushkin <Dmytro.Laktyushkin@amd.com>
Acked-by: Bindu Ramamurthy <bindu.r@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[Why]
When video plane is rotate the cursor position is incorrect and not
matching the desktop location.
[How]
When a plane is rotated 90 or 270 degrees, the src_rect.width and height
should be swapped when determining the scaling factor compared to the
dst_rect.
Signed-off-by: Aric Cyr <aric.cyr@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Jun Lei <Jun.Lei@amd.com>
Acked-by: Bindu Ramamurthy <bindu.r@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Once drm_framebuffer_init has returned 0, the framebuffer is hooked up
to the reference counting machinery and can no longer be destroyed with
a simple kfree. Therefore, it must be called last.
If drm_framebuffer_init returns 0 but its caller then returns non-0,
there will likely be memory corruption fireworks down the road.
The following lead me to this fix:
[ 12.891228] kernel BUG at lib/list_debug.c:25!
[...]
[ 12.891263] RIP: 0010:__list_add_valid+0x4b/0x70
[...]
[ 12.891324] Call Trace:
[ 12.891330] drm_framebuffer_init+0xb5/0x100 [drm]
[ 12.891378] amdgpu_display_gem_fb_verify_and_init+0x47/0x120 [amdgpu]
[ 12.891592] ? amdgpu_display_user_framebuffer_create+0x10d/0x1f0 [amdgpu]
[ 12.891794] amdgpu_display_user_framebuffer_create+0x126/0x1f0 [amdgpu]
[ 12.891995] drm_internal_framebuffer_create+0x378/0x3f0 [drm]
[ 12.892036] ? drm_internal_framebuffer_create+0x3f0/0x3f0 [drm]
[ 12.892075] drm_mode_addfb2+0x34/0xd0 [drm]
[ 12.892115] ? drm_internal_framebuffer_create+0x3f0/0x3f0 [drm]
[ 12.892153] drm_ioctl_kernel+0xe2/0x150 [drm]
[ 12.892193] drm_ioctl+0x3da/0x460 [drm]
[ 12.892232] ? drm_internal_framebuffer_create+0x3f0/0x3f0 [drm]
[ 12.892274] amdgpu_drm_ioctl+0x43/0x80 [amdgpu]
[ 12.892475] __se_sys_ioctl+0x72/0xc0
[ 12.892483] do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40
[ 12.892491] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
Fixes: f258907fdd "drm/amdgpu: Verify bo size can fit framebuffer size on init."
Signed-off-by: Michel Dänzer <mdaenzer@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
While checking the master status of the DRM file in
drm_is_current_master(), the device's master mutex should be
held. Without the mutex, the pointer fpriv->master may be freed
concurrently by another process calling drm_setmaster_ioctl(). This
could lead to use-after-free errors when the pointer is subsequently
dereferenced in drm_lease_owner().
The callers of drm_is_current_master() from drm_auth.c hold the
device's master mutex, but external callers do not. Hence, we implement
drm_is_current_master_locked() to be used within drm_auth.c, and
modify drm_is_current_master() to grab the device's master mutex
before checking the master status.
Reported-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Signed-off-by: Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi <desmondcheongzx@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov@gmail.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210620110327.4964-2-desmondcheongzx@gmail.com
Once drm_framebuffer_init has returned 0, the framebuffer is hooked up
to the reference counting machinery and can no longer be destroyed with
a simple kfree. Therefore, it must be called last.
If drm_framebuffer_init returns 0 but its caller then returns non-0,
there will likely be memory corruption fireworks down the road.
The following lead me to this fix:
[ 12.891228] kernel BUG at lib/list_debug.c:25!
[...]
[ 12.891263] RIP: 0010:__list_add_valid+0x4b/0x70
[...]
[ 12.891324] Call Trace:
[ 12.891330] drm_framebuffer_init+0xb5/0x100 [drm]
[ 12.891378] amdgpu_display_gem_fb_verify_and_init+0x47/0x120 [amdgpu]
[ 12.891592] ? amdgpu_display_user_framebuffer_create+0x10d/0x1f0 [amdgpu]
[ 12.891794] amdgpu_display_user_framebuffer_create+0x126/0x1f0 [amdgpu]
[ 12.891995] drm_internal_framebuffer_create+0x378/0x3f0 [drm]
[ 12.892036] ? drm_internal_framebuffer_create+0x3f0/0x3f0 [drm]
[ 12.892075] drm_mode_addfb2+0x34/0xd0 [drm]
[ 12.892115] ? drm_internal_framebuffer_create+0x3f0/0x3f0 [drm]
[ 12.892153] drm_ioctl_kernel+0xe2/0x150 [drm]
[ 12.892193] drm_ioctl+0x3da/0x460 [drm]
[ 12.892232] ? drm_internal_framebuffer_create+0x3f0/0x3f0 [drm]
[ 12.892274] amdgpu_drm_ioctl+0x43/0x80 [amdgpu]
[ 12.892475] __se_sys_ioctl+0x72/0xc0
[ 12.892483] do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40
[ 12.892491] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
Fixes: f258907fdd "drm/amdgpu: Verify bo size can fit framebuffer size on init."
Signed-off-by: Michel Dänzer <mdaenzer@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Fix coccicheck warning:
./drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dml/dcn31/display_rq_dlg_calc_31.c:
55:12-42: duplicated argument to && or ||
Reviewed-by: Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Wan Jiabing <wanjiabing@vivo.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
In preparation to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang, fix
the following warning by replacing a /* fall through */ comment
with the new pseudo-keyword macro fallthrough:
rivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dce/dce_aux.c:672:4: warning: unannotated fall-through between switch labels [-Wimplicit-fallthrough]
case AUX_TRANSACTION_REPLY_I2C_OVER_AUX_DEFER:
^
Notice that Clang doesn't recognize /* fall through */ comments as
implicit fall-through markings, so in order to globally enable
-Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang, these comments need to be
replaced with fallthrough; in the whole codebase.
Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/115
Reviewed-by: Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
