The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230302144732.1903781-23-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230302144732.1903781-22-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230302144732.1903781-21-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230302144732.1903781-20-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230302144732.1903781-19-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230302144732.1903781-18-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230302144732.1903781-17-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230302144732.1903781-16-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230302144732.1903781-15-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230302144732.1903781-14-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230302144732.1903781-13-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230302144732.1903781-12-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Acked-by: Pali Rohár <pali@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230302144732.1903781-11-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230302144732.1903781-10-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230302144732.1903781-9-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230302144732.1903781-8-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230302144732.1903781-7-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230302144732.1903781-6-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230302144732.1903781-5-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230302144732.1903781-4-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230302144732.1903781-3-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
void.
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230302144732.1903781-2-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
When support for instantiating an i2c-client for the fuel-gauge was
added for the Windows based Yoga Book YB1-X91F/L models, the assumption
was made that this would apply to the Android based YB1-X90F/L models too.
But these have a completely different BIOS with completely different DMI
strings. Update the existing YB1-X91 support to reflect that it only
applies to the YB1-X91F/L models.
Cc: Yauhen Kharuzhy <jekhor@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230301092331.7038-15-hdegoede@redhat.com
The Yoga Tablet 2 1050/830 series have a HALL sensor for detecting
when their (optional) case/cover is closed over the screen.
Their Windows counterparts (alsmost the same HW, different BIOS)
model this as a LID switch. Add support for reporting this as
a LID switch on the Android models too.
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230301092331.7038-14-hdegoede@redhat.com
The YT3 uses an TI LP8557 LED backlight controller, the LP8557's PWM input
is connected to a PWM output coming from the LCD panel's controller.
The Android kernel has a hack in the i915 driver to write the non-standard
DSI reg 0x51 with the desired level to set the duty-cycle of the LCD's PWM.
To avoid having to have a similar hack in the mainline kernel program
instantiate an i2c-client for the LP8557 with platform-data to have
the LP8557 to directly set the level (ignoring its PWM input), this allows
backlight brightness control through a backlight device registered by
the lp855x_bl driver.
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230301092331.7038-13-hdegoede@redhat.com
The Peaq C1010 tablet has a special "Dolby" button. This button has
a WMI interface, but this is broken in several ways:
1. It only supports polling
2. The value read on polling goes from 0 -> 1 for one poll on both edges
of the button, with no way to tell which edge causes the poll to
return 1.
3. It uses a non unique GUID (it uses the Microsoft docs WMI example GUID).
There currently is a WMI driver for this, but it uses several kludges
to work around these issues and is not entirely reliable due to 2.
Replace the unreliable WMI driver by using the x86-android-tablets code
to instantiate a gpio_keys device for this.
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230301092331.7038-11-hdegoede@redhat.com
The Acer Iconia One 7 B1-750 is a x86 ACPI tablet which ships with Android
x86 as factory OS. Its DSDT contains a bunch of I2C devices which are not
actually there, causing various resource conflicts. Enumeration of these
is skipped through the acpi_quirk_skip_i2c_client_enumeration().
Add support for manually instantiating the I2C + other devices which are
actually present on this tablet by adding the necessary device info to
the x86-android-tablets module.
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230301092331.7038-2-hdegoede@redhat.com
The common IOCTL handler has a predefined list of IOCTLs it can
handle. There is no default handler, if there is no match.
Allow a client driver to define their own version of default IOCTL
callback. In this way the default handling is passed to the client
drivers to handle.
With the introduction of TPMI target, IOCTL list is extended. The
additional TPMI specific IOCTLs will be passed to the TPMI client
driver default IOCTL handler.
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230211063257.311746-4-srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
REGMAP is a hidden (not user visible) symbol. Users cannot set it
directly thru "make *config", so drivers should select it instead of
depending on it if they need it.
Consistently using "select" or "depends on" can also help reduce
Kconfig circular dependency issues.
Therefore, change the use of "depends on REGMAP" to "select REGMAP".
For NVSW_SN2201, select REGMAP_I2C instead of depending on it.
Fixes: c6acad68eb ("platform/mellanox: mlxreg-hotplug: Modify to use a regmap interface")
Fixes: 5ec4a8ace0 ("platform/mellanox: Introduce support for Mellanox register access driver")
Fixes: 62f9529b8d ("platform/mellanox: mlxreg-lc: Add initial support for Nvidia line card devices")
Fixes: 662f24826f ("platform/mellanox: Add support for new SN2201 system")
Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Cc: Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org>
Cc: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Cc: Michael Shych <michaelsh@nvidia.com>
Cc: Mark Gross <markgross@kernel.org>
Cc: Vadim Pasternak <vadimp@nvidia.com>
Cc: platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230226053953.4681-6-rdunlap@infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
After using the built-in UEFI hardware diagnostics to compare
the measured battery temperature, i noticed that the temperature
is actually expressed in tenth degree kelvin, similar to the
SBS-Data standard. For example, a value of 2992 is displayed as
26 degrees celsius.
Fix the scaling so that the correct values are being displayed.
Tested on a Dell Inspiron 3505.
Fixes: a77272c160 ("platform/x86: dell: Add new dell-wmi-ddv driver")
Signed-off-by: Armin Wolf <W_Armin@gmx.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230218115318.20662-2-W_Armin@gmx.de
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
If one or both sensor buffers could not be initialized, either
due to missing hardware support or due to some error during probing,
the resume handler will encounter undefined behaviour when
attempting to lock buffers then protected by an uninitialized or
destroyed mutex.
Fix this by introducing a "active" flag which is set during probe,
and only invalidate buffers which where flaged as "active".
Tested on a Dell Inspiron 3505.
Fixes: 3b7eeff93d ("platform/x86: dell-ddv: Add hwmon support")
Signed-off-by: Armin Wolf <W_Armin@gmx.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230218115318.20662-1-W_Armin@gmx.de
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
The amd_pmc_write_stb() function was previously hidden in an
ifdef to avoid a warning when CONFIG_SUSPEND is disabled, but
now there is an additional caller:
drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmc.c: In function 'amd_pmc_stb_debugfs_open_v2':
drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmc.c:256:8: error: implicit declaration of function 'amd_pmc_write_stb'; did you mean 'amd_pmc_read_stb'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
256 | ret = amd_pmc_write_stb(dev, AMD_PMC_STB_DUMMY_PC);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| amd_pmc_read_stb
There is now an easier way to handle this using DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS()
to replace all the #ifdefs, letting gcc drop any of the unused functions
silently.
Fixes: b0d4bb9735 ("platform/x86/amd: pmc: Write dummy postcode into the STB DRAM")
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230214152512.806188-1-arnd@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
The thermal zone parameter specifies the bang-bang governor.
The Kconfig selects the bang-bang governor. So it is pointless to test
if the governor was set for the thermal zone assuming it may not have
been compiled-in.
Remove the test and prevent another access into the thermal internals.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Peter Kaestle <peter@piie.net>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
