Until commit 7e8a50df26 ("soc: renesas: rcar-sysc: Drop legacy
handling") in v4.19, the rcar_sysc_ch structure was part of the API for
legacy board code not yet using DT. Since then, there is no longer a
reason to keep it as a separate structure.
Moreover, a future quirk handling will need access to the rcar_sysc_pd
structure's flags member in rcar_sysc_pwr_on_off(). Hence absorb the
rcar_sysc_ch structure into the rcar_sysc_pd structure, and pass around
the latter instead of the former.
Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Reviewed-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/672805a8c52ce63200e342212bbe6f84a445397b.1713348705.git.geert+renesas@glider.be
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
The delays used with the various atomic polling loops are already at the
maximum value of ~10µs, as documented for read_poll_timeout_atomic().
Hence reduce the delays from 10 to 1 µs. Increase PDRESR_RETRIES
accordingly, to retain the old (generous) timeout value.
Measurements on R-Car V3U, S4, V4H, and V4M show that the first three
polling loops rarely (never?) loop, so the actual delay does not matter.
The fourth loop (for SYSCISCR in rcar_gen4_sysc_power()) typically ran
for one or two cycles with the old delay. With the reduced delay, it
typically runs for two to 17 cycles, and finishes earlier than before,
which can reduce loop time up to a factor of three.
While at it, rename the SYSCISR_{TIMEOUT,DELAY_US} definitions to
SYSCISCR_{TIMEOUT,DELAY_US}, to match the register name they apply to.
Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/77f150522096d55c6da0ff983db61e0cf6309344.1709317289.git.geert+renesas@glider.be
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
It has been pointed out that naming a subsystem "genpd" isn't very
self-explanatory and the acronym itself that means Generic PM Domain, is
known only by a limited group of people.
In a way to improve the situation, let's rename the subsystem to pmdomain,
which ideally should indicate that this is about so called Power Domains or
"PM domains" as we often also use within the Linux Kernel terminology.
Suggested-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Acked-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230912221127.487327-1-ulf.hansson@linaro.org
