On BeagleBone Black:
OF: /ocp: Read of boolean property 'clocks' with a value.
OF: /ocp/interconnect@44c00000: Read of boolean property 'clocks' with a value.
OF: /ocp/interconnect@48000000: Read of boolean property 'clocks' with a value.
OF: /ocp/interconnect@4a000000: Read of boolean property 'clocks' with a value.
The use of of_property_read_bool() for non-boolean properties is
deprecated in favor of of_property_present() when testing for property
presence.
Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/accb12bd6d048d95bd1feea07dd1a799ad3f8b31.1737532423.git.geert+renesas@glider.be
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
When a device supports IO daisy-chain wakeups, it uses a dedicated
wake IRQ. Devices with IO daisy-chain wakeups enabled should not set
wakeup constraints since these can happen even from deep power states,
so should not prevent the DM from picking deep power states.
Wake IRQs are set with dev_pm_set_wake_irq() or
dev_pm_set_dedicated_wake_irq(). The latter is used by the serial
driver used on K3 platforms (drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_omap.c)
when the interrupts-extended property is used to describe the
dedicated wakeup interrupt.
Detect these wake IRQs in the suspend path, and if set, skip sending
constraint.
Tested-by: Dhruva Gole <d-gole@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com>
Reviewed-by: Dhruva Gole <d-gole@ti.com>
Message-ID: <20241206-lpm-v6-10-constraints-pmdomain-v6-3-833980158c68@baylibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
For each device in a TI SCI PM domain, check whether the device has
any resume latency constraints set via per-device PM QoS. If
constraints are set, send them to DM via the new SCI constraints API.
Checking for constraints happen for each device before system-wide
suspend (via ->suspend() hook.)
An important detail here is that the PM domain driver inserts itself
into the path of both the ->suspend() and ->resume() hook path
of *all* devices in the PM domain. This allows generic PM domain code
to handle the constraint management and communication with TI SCI.
Further, this allows device drivers to use existing PM QoS APIs to
add/update constraints.
DM firmware clears constraints during its resume, so Linux has
to check/update/send constraints each time system suspends.
Also note that the PM QoS framework uses usecs as the units for
latency whereas the TI SCI firmware uses msecs, so a conversion is
needed before passing to TI SCI.
Co-developed-by: Vibhore Vardhan <vibhore@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Vibhore Vardhan <vibhore@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Markus Schneider-Pargmann <msp@baylibre.com>
Reviewed-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Dhruva Gole <d-gole@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com>
Reviewed-by: Dhruva Gole <d-gole@ti.com>
Message-ID: <20241206-lpm-v6-10-constraints-pmdomain-v6-1-833980158c68@baylibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
When the dts file has multiple referrers to a single PD (e.g.
simple-framebuffer and dss nodes both point to the DSS power-domain) the
ti-sci driver will create two power domains, both with the same ID, and
that will cause problems as one of the power domains will hide the other
one.
Fix this checking if a PD with the ID has already been created, and only
create a PD for new IDs.
Fixes: efa5c01cd7 ("soc: ti: ti_sci_pm_domains: switch to use multiple genpds instead of one")
Signed-off-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ideasonboard.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240415-ti-sci-pd-v1-1-a0e56b8ad897@ideasonboard.com
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
The TI_SCI_PM_DOMAINS Kconfig option belongs closer to its corresponding
implementation, hence let's move it from the soc subsystem to the pmdomain
subsystem.
While at it, let's also add a Kconfig option the omap_prm driver, rather
than using ARCH_OMAP2PLUS directly.
Cc: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Cc: Santosh Shilimkar <ssantosh@kernel.org>
Cc: Tero Kristo <kristo@kernel.org>
Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Reviewed-by: Dhruva Gole <d-gole@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
It has been pointed out that naming a subsystem "genpd" isn't very
self-explanatory and the acronym itself that means Generic PM Domain, is
known only by a limited group of people.
In a way to improve the situation, let's rename the subsystem to pmdomain,
which ideally should indicate that this is about so called Power Domains or
"PM domains" as we often also use within the Linux Kernel terminology.
Suggested-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Acked-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230912221127.487327-1-ulf.hansson@linaro.org