Instead of walking the list of children of an ACPI device directly,
use acpi_dev_for_each_child() to carry out an action for all of
the given ACPI device's children.
This will help to eliminate the children list head from struct
acpi_device as it is redundant and it is used in questionable ways
in some places (in particular, locking is needed for walking the
list pointed to it safely, but it is often missing).
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
The last resume result exposing logic in cros_ec_sleep_event()
incorrectly requires S0ix support, which doesn't work on ARM based
systems where S0ix doesn't exist. That's because cros_ec_sleep_event()
only reports the last resume result when the EC indicates the last sleep
event was an S0ix resume. On ARM systems, the last sleep event is always
S3 resume, but the EC can still detect sleep hang events in case some
other part of the AP is blocking sleep.
Always expose the last resume result if the EC supports it so that this
works on all devices regardless of S0ix support. This fixes sleep hang
detection on ARM based chromebooks like Trogdor.
Cc: Rajat Jain <rajatja@chromium.org>
Cc: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>
Cc: Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@chromium.org>
Cc: Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <groeck@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Evan Green <evgreen@chromium.org>
Fixes: 7235560ac7 ("platform/chrome: Add support for v1 of host sleep event")
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220614075726.2729987-1-swboyd@chromium.org
Add support for the detachable keyboard cover on the Surface Pro 8.
The keyboard cover on the Surface Pro 8 is, unlike the keyboard covers
of earlier Surface Pro generations, handled via the Surface System
Aggregator Module (SSAM). The keyboard and touchpad (as well as other
HID input devices) of this cover are standard SSAM HID client devices
(just like keyboard and touchpad on e.g. the Surface Laptop 3 and 4),
however, some care needs to be taken as they can be physically detached
(similarly to the Surface Book 3). Specifically, the respective SSAM
client devices need to be removed when the keyboard cover has been
detached and (re-)initialized when the keyboard cover has been
(re-)attached.
On the Surface Pro 8, detachment of the keyboard cover (and by extension
its devices) is managed via the KIP subsystem. Therefore, said devices
need to be registered under the KIP device hub, which in turn will
remove and re-create/re-initialize those devices as needed.
Signed-off-by: Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220527023447.2460025-13-luzmaximilian@gmail.com
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Add a Surface System Aggregator Module (SSAM) client device hub for
hot-removable devices managed via the KIP subsystem.
The KIP subsystem (full name unknown, abbreviation has been obtained
through reverse engineering) is a subsystem that manages hot-removable
SSAM client devices. Specifically, it manages HID input devices
contained in the detachable keyboard cover of the Surface Pro 8 and
Surface Pro X.
The KIP subsystem handles a single group of devices (e.g. all devices
contained in the keyboard cover) and cannot handle devices individually.
Thus we model it as a client device hub, which (hot-)removes all devices
contained under it once removal of the hub (e.g. keyboard cover) has
been detected and (re-)adds all devices once the physical hub device has
been (re-)attached. To do this, use the previously generified SSAM
subsystem hub framework.
Signed-off-by: Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220527023447.2460025-12-luzmaximilian@gmail.com
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
The Surface System Aggregator Module (SSAM) has multiple subsystems that
can manage detachable devices. At the moment, we only support the "base"
(BAS/0x11) subsystem, which is used on the Surface Book 3 to manage
devices (including keyboard, touchpad, and secondary battery) connected
to the base of the device.
The Surface Pro 8 has a new type-cover with keyboard and touchpad, which
is managed via the KIP/0x0e subsystem. The general procedure is the
same, but with slightly different events and setup. To make
implementation of the KIP hub easier and prevent duplication, generify
the parts of the base hub that we can use for the KIP hub (or any
potential future subsystem hubs).
This also switches over to use the newly introduced "hot-remove"
functionality, which should prevent communication issues when devices
have been detached.
Lastly, also drop the undocumented and unused sysfs "state" attribute of
the base hub. It has at best been useful for debugging.
Signed-off-by: Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220527023447.2460025-10-luzmaximilian@gmail.com
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
When SSAM client devices have been (physically) hot-removed,
communication attempts with those devices may fail and time out. This
can even extend to event notifiers, due to which timeouts may occur
during device removal, slowing down that process.
Add a parameter to the notifier unregister function that allows skipping
communication with the EC to prevent this. Furthermore, add wrappers for
registering and unregistering notifiers belonging to SSAM client devices
that automatically check if the device has been marked as hot-removed
and communication should be avoided.
Note that non-SSAM client devices can generally not be hot-removed, so
also add a convenience wrapper for those, defaulting to allow
communication.
Signed-off-by: Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220527023447.2460025-4-luzmaximilian@gmail.com
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Pull x86 platform driver fixes from Hans de Goede:
"Highlights:
- Fix hp-wmi regression on HP Omen laptops introduced in 5.18
- Several hardware-id additions
- A couple of other tiny fixes"
* tag 'platform-drivers-x86-v5.19-2' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/pdx86/platform-drivers-x86:
platform/x86/intel: hid: Add Surface Go to VGBS allow list
platform/x86: hp-wmi: Use zero insize parameter only when supported
platform/x86: hp-wmi: Resolve WMI query failures on some devices
platform/x86: gigabyte-wmi: Add support for B450M DS3H-CF
platform/x86: gigabyte-wmi: Add Z690M AORUS ELITE AX DDR4 support
platform/x86: barco-p50-gpio: Add check for platform_driver_register
platform/x86/intel: pmc: Support Intel Raptorlake P
platform/x86/intel: Fix pmt_crashlog array reference
platform/mellanox: Add static in struct declaration.
platform/mellanox: Spelling s/platfom/platform/
The def_bool y PMC_ATOM Kconfig option provides a couple of symbols used
by the code enabled by the X86_INTEL_LPSS option and it registers some
clocks. These clocks are only registered on Bay Trail, Cherry Trail and
Brasswell Intel SoCs and kernels targeting these SoCs must always have
the X86_INTEL_LPSS option enabled otherwise many things will not work.
Building the PMC_ATOM code on kernels which are not targeting the
mentioned SoCs and which do not have the X86_INTEL_LPSS enabled is
not useful.
This means that we can simplify things by replacing the PMC_ATOM Kconfig
option in Makefiles with X86_INTEL_LPSS and then drop the option.
Cc: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220503140207.101218-2-hdegoede@redhat.com
commit be9d73e649 ("platform/x86: hp-wmi: Fix 0x05 error code reported by
several WMI calls") and commit 12b19f14a2 ("platform/x86: hp-wmi: Fix
hp_wmi_read_int() reporting error (0x05)") cause ACPI BIOS Error (bug):
Attempt to CreateField of length zero (20211217/dsopcode-133) because of
the ACPI method HWMC, which unconditionally creates a Field of
size (insize*8) bits:
CreateField (Arg1, 0x80, (Local5 * 0x08), DAIN)
In cases where args->insize = 0, the Field size is 0, resulting in
an error.
Fix this by using zero insize only if 0x5 error code is returned
Tested on Omen 15 AMD (2020) board ID: 8786.
Fixes: be9d73e649 ("platform/x86: hp-wmi: Fix 0x05 error code reported by several WMI calls")
Signed-off-by: Bedant Patnaik <bedant.patnaik@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Jorge Lopez <jorge.lopez2@hp.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/41be46743d21c78741232a47bbb5f1cdbcc3d21e.camel@gmail.com
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
WMI queries fail on some devices where the ACPI method HWMC
unconditionally attempts to create Fields beyond the buffer
if the buffer is too small, this breaks essential features
such as power profiles:
CreateByteField (Arg1, 0x10, D008)
CreateByteField (Arg1, 0x11, D009)
CreateByteField (Arg1, 0x12, D010)
CreateDWordField (Arg1, 0x10, D032)
CreateField (Arg1, 0x80, 0x0400, D128)
In cases where args->data had zero length, ACPI BIOS Error
(bug): AE_AML_BUFFER_LIMIT, Field [D008] at bit
offset/length 128/8 exceeds size of target Buffer (128 bits)
(20211217/dsopcode-198) was obtained.
ACPI BIOS Error (bug): AE_AML_BUFFER_LIMIT, Field [D009] at bit
offset/length 136/8 exceeds size of target Buffer (136bits)
(20211217/dsopcode-198)
The original code created a buffer size of 128 bytes regardless if
the WMI call required a smaller buffer or not. This particular
behavior occurs in older BIOS and reproduced in OMEN laptops. Newer
BIOS handles buffer sizes properly and meets the latest specification
requirements. This is the reason why testing with a dynamically
allocated buffer did not uncover any failures with the test systems at
hand.
This patch was tested on several OMEN, Elite, and Zbooks. It was
confirmed the patch resolves HPWMI_FAN GET/SET calls in an OMEN
Laptop 15-ek0xxx. No problems were reported when testing on several Elite
and Zbooks notebooks.
Fixes: 4b4967cbd2 ("platform/x86: hp-wmi: Changing bios_args.data to be dynamically allocated")
Signed-off-by: Jorge Lopez <jorge.lopez2@hp.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220608212923.8585-2-jorge.lopez2@hp.com
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
cros_ec_get_host_event_wake_mask() expects to receive
sizeof(struct ec_response_host_event_mask) from send_command(). The
payload is valid only if the return value is positive.
Return -EPROTO if send_command() returns 0 in
cros_ec_get_host_event_wake_mask().
Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <groeck@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220609084957.3684698-22-tzungbi@kernel.org
cros_ec_get_host_event_wake_mask() expects to receive
sizeof(struct ec_response_host_event_mask) from send_command().
The payload is valid only if the return value is positive.
Add Kunit tests for returning 0 from send_command() in
cros_ec_get_host_event_wake_mask().
Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <groeck@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220609084957.3684698-21-tzungbi@kernel.org
cros_ec_get_host_event_wake_mask() used to return value from
send_command() which is number of bytes for input payload on success
(i.e. sizeof(struct ec_response_host_event_mask)).
However, the callers don't need to know how many bytes are available.
Don't return number of available bytes. Instead, return 0 on success;
otherwise, negative integers on error.
Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <groeck@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220609084957.3684698-20-tzungbi@kernel.org
cros_ec_get_host_command_version_mask() expects to receive
sizeof(struct ec_response_get_cmd_versions) from send_command(). The
payload is valid only if the return value is positive.
Return -EPROTO if send_command() returns 0 in
cros_ec_get_host_command_version_mask().
Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <groeck@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220609084957.3684698-19-tzungbi@kernel.org
cros_ec_get_host_command_version_mask() expects to receive
sizeof(struct ec_response_get_cmd_versions) from send_command().
The payload is valid only if the return value is positive.
Add Kunit tests for returning 0 from send_command() in
cros_ec_get_host_command_version_mask().
Note that because the 2 cros_ec_get_host_command_version_mask() use the
same `ver_mask`. cros_ec_proto_test_query_all_no_host_sleep_return0()
polluates the `ver_mask` and returns 0 on the second send_command() to
make sure the second cros_ec_get_host_command_version_mask() doesn't
take the garbage from the previous call.
Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <groeck@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220609084957.3684698-18-tzungbi@kernel.org
cros_ec_query_all() uses cros_ec_get_host_command_version_mask() to
query the supported MKBP version; cros_ec_get_host_command_version_mask()
uses send_command() for transferring the host command.
Returning >=0 from send_command() only denotes the transfer was success.
cros_ec_get_host_command_version_mask() should check if EC wasn't happy
by checking `msg->result`.
Add a Kunit test for returning error in `msg->result` in
cros_ec_get_host_command_version_mask(). For the case,
cros_ec_query_all() should find the EC device doesn't support MKBP.
Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <groeck@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220609084957.3684698-16-tzungbi@kernel.org
cros_ec_get_host_command_version_mask() used to return value from
send_command() which is number of available bytes for input payload on
success (i.e. sizeof(struct ec_response_get_cmd_versions)).
However, the callers don't need to know how many bytes are available.
Don't return number of available bytes. Instead, return 0 on success;
otherwise, negative integers on error.
Also remove the unneeded `ver_mask` initialization as the callers should
take it only if cros_ec_get_host_command_version_mask() returns 0.
Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <groeck@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220609084957.3684698-15-tzungbi@kernel.org
cros_ec_get_proto_info_legacy() expects to receive
sizeof(struct ec_response_hello) from send_command(). The payload is
valid only if the return value is positive.
Add a Kunit test for returning 0 from send_command() in
cros_ec_get_proto_info_legacy().
Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <groeck@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220609084957.3684698-12-tzungbi@kernel.org
cros_ec_get_proto_info() expects to receive
sizeof(struct ec_response_get_protocol_info) from send_command(). The
payload is valid only if the return value is positive.
Add Kunit tests for returning 0 from send_command() in
cros_ec_get_proto_info().
Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <groeck@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220609084957.3684698-9-tzungbi@kernel.org
