Use the new helpers to decide whether the interrupt should be handled and
switch the descriptor locking to guard().
Note: The mask_irq() operation in the second condition was redundant as the
interrupt is already masked right at the beginning of the function.
Fixup the kernel doc comment while at it.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250429065421.175652864@linutronix.de
The interrupt core code has an ever repeating pattern:
unsigned long flags;
struct irq_desc *desc = irq_get_desc_[bus]lock(irq, &flags, mode);
if (!desc)
return -EINVAL;
....
irq_put_desc_[bus]unlock(desc, flags);
That requires gotos in failure paths and just creates visual clutter.
Provide lock guards, which allow to simplify the code.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250429065420.061659985@linutronix.de
In the kernel fq qdisc implementation, it only needs to look at
the fields of the first node in a list but does not always
need to remove it from the list. It is more convenient to have
a peek kfunc for the list. It works similar to the bpf_rbtree_first().
This patch adds bpf_list_{front,back} kfunc. The verifier is changed
such that the kfunc returning "struct bpf_list_node *" will be
marked as non-owning. The exception is the KF_ACQUIRE kfunc. The
net effect is only the new bpf_list_{front,back} kfuncs will
have its return pointer marked as non-owning.
Acked-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250506015857.817950-8-martin.lau@linux.dev
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
The next patch will add bpf_list_{front,back} kfuncs to peek the head
and tail of a list. Both of them will return a 'struct bpf_list_node *'.
Follow the earlier change for rbtree, this patch checks the
return btf type is a 'struct bpf_list_node' pointer instead
of checking each kfuncs individually to decide if
mark_reg_graph_node should be called. This will make
the bpf_list_{front,back} kfunc addition easier in
the later patch.
Acked-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250506015857.817950-7-martin.lau@linux.dev
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
The bpf_rbtree_{remove,left,right} requires the root's lock to be held.
They also check the node_internal->owner is still owned by that root
before proceeding, so it is safe to allow refcounted bpf_rb_node
pointer to be used in these kfuncs.
In a bpf fq implementation which is much closer to the kernel fq,
https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20250418224652.105998-13-martin.lau@linux.dev/,
a networking flow (allocated by bpf_obj_new) can be added to two different
rbtrees. There are cases that the flow is searched from one rbtree,
held the refcount of the flow, and then removed from another rbtree:
struct fq_flow {
struct bpf_rb_node fq_node;
struct bpf_rb_node rate_node;
struct bpf_refcount refcount;
unsigned long sk_long;
};
int bpf_fq_enqueue(...)
{
/* ... */
bpf_spin_lock(&root->lock);
while (can_loop) {
/* ... */
if (!p)
break;
gc_f = bpf_rb_entry(p, struct fq_flow, fq_node);
if (gc_f->sk_long == sk_long) {
f = bpf_refcount_acquire(gc_f);
break;
}
/* ... */
}
bpf_spin_unlock(&root->lock);
if (f) {
bpf_spin_lock(&q->lock);
bpf_rbtree_remove(&q->delayed, &f->rate_node);
bpf_spin_unlock(&q->lock);
}
}
bpf_rbtree_{left,right} do not need this change but are relaxed together
with bpf_rbtree_remove instead of adding extra verifier logic
to exclude these kfuncs.
To avoid bi-sect failure, this patch also changes the selftests together.
The "rbtree_api_remove_unadded_node" is not expecting verifier's error.
The test now expects bpf_rbtree_remove(&groot, &m->node) to return NULL.
The test uses __retval(0) to ensure this NULL return value.
Some of the "only take non-owning..." failure messages are changed also.
Acked-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250506015857.817950-5-martin.lau@linux.dev
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
In a bpf fq implementation that is much closer to the kernel fq,
it will need to traverse the rbtree:
https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20250418224652.105998-13-martin.lau@linux.dev/
The much simplified logic that uses the bpf_rbtree_{root,left,right}
to traverse the rbtree is like:
struct fq_flow {
struct bpf_rb_node fq_node;
struct bpf_rb_node rate_node;
struct bpf_refcount refcount;
unsigned long sk_long;
};
struct fq_flow_root {
struct bpf_spin_lock lock;
struct bpf_rb_root root __contains(fq_flow, fq_node);
};
struct fq_flow *fq_classify(...)
{
struct bpf_rb_node *tofree[FQ_GC_MAX];
struct fq_flow_root *root;
struct fq_flow *gc_f, *f;
struct bpf_rb_node *p;
int i, fcnt = 0;
/* ... */
f = NULL;
bpf_spin_lock(&root->lock);
p = bpf_rbtree_root(&root->root);
while (can_loop) {
if (!p)
break;
gc_f = bpf_rb_entry(p, struct fq_flow, fq_node);
if (gc_f->sk_long == sk_long) {
f = bpf_refcount_acquire(gc_f);
break;
}
/* To be removed from the rbtree */
if (fcnt < FQ_GC_MAX && fq_gc_candidate(gc_f, jiffies_now))
tofree[fcnt++] = p;
if (gc_f->sk_long > sk_long)
p = bpf_rbtree_left(&root->root, p);
else
p = bpf_rbtree_right(&root->root, p);
}
/* remove from the rbtree */
for (i = 0; i < fcnt; i++) {
p = tofree[i];
tofree[i] = bpf_rbtree_remove(&root->root, p);
}
bpf_spin_unlock(&root->lock);
/* bpf_obj_drop the fq_flow(s) that have just been removed
* from the rbtree.
*/
for (i = 0; i < fcnt; i++) {
p = tofree[i];
if (p) {
gc_f = bpf_rb_entry(p, struct fq_flow, fq_node);
bpf_obj_drop(gc_f);
}
}
return f;
}
The above simplified code needs to traverse the rbtree for two purposes,
1) find the flow with the desired sk_long value
2) while searching for the sk_long, collect flows that are
the fq_gc_candidate. They will be removed from the rbtree.
This patch adds the bpf_rbtree_{root,left,right} kfunc to enable
the rbtree traversal. The returned bpf_rb_node pointer will be a
non-owning reference which is the same as the returned pointer
of the exisiting bpf_rbtree_first kfunc.
Acked-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250506015857.817950-4-martin.lau@linux.dev
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
The current rbtree kfunc, bpf_rbtree_{first, remove}, returns the
bpf_rb_node pointer. The check_kfunc_call currently checks the
kfunc btf_id instead of its return pointer type to decide
if it needs to do mark_reg_graph_node(reg0) and ref_set_non_owning(reg0).
The later patch will add bpf_rbtree_{root,left,right} that will also
return a bpf_rb_node pointer. Instead of adding more kfunc btf_id
checks to the "if" case, this patch changes the test to check the
kfunc's return type. is_rbtree_node_type() function is added to
test if a pointer type is a bpf_rb_node. The callers have already
skipped the modifiers of the pointer type.
A note on the ref_set_non_owning(), although bpf_rbtree_remove()
also returns a bpf_rb_node pointer, the bpf_rbtree_remove()
has the KF_ACQUIRE flag. Thus, its reg0 will not become non-owning.
Acked-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250506015857.817950-3-martin.lau@linux.dev
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
In a later patch, two new kfuncs will take the bpf_rb_node pointer arg.
struct bpf_rb_node *bpf_rbtree_left(struct bpf_rb_root *root,
struct bpf_rb_node *node);
struct bpf_rb_node *bpf_rbtree_right(struct bpf_rb_root *root,
struct bpf_rb_node *node);
In the check_kfunc_call, there is a "case KF_ARG_PTR_TO_RB_NODE"
to check if the reg->type should be an allocated pointer or should be
a non_owning_ref.
The later patch will need to ensure that the bpf_rb_node pointer passing
to the new bpf_rbtree_{left,right} must be a non_owning_ref. This
should be the same requirement as the existing bpf_rbtree_remove.
This patch swaps the current "if else" statement. Instead of checking
the bpf_rbtree_remove, it checks the bpf_rbtree_add. Then the new
bpf_rbtree_{left,right} will fall into the "else" case to make
the later patch simpler. bpf_rbtree_add should be the only
one that needs an allocated pointer.
This should be a no-op change considering there are only two kfunc(s)
taking bpf_rb_node pointer arg, rbtree_add and rbtree_remove.
Acked-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250506015857.817950-2-martin.lau@linux.dev
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
The last remaining user of vfs_submount() (tracefs) is easy to convert
to fs_context_for_submount(); do that and bury that thing, along with
SB_SUBMOUNT
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Acked-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Tested-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
