Pull SoC update from Arnd Bergmann:
"Convert ep93xx to devicetree
This concludes a long journey towards replacing the old board files
with devictree description on the Cirrus Logic EP93xx platform.
Nikita Shubin has been working on this for a long time, for details
see the last post on
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240909-ep93xx-v12-0-e86ab2423d4b@maquefel.me/"
* tag 'soc-ep93xx-dt-6.12' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/soc/soc: (47 commits)
dt-bindings: gpio: ep9301: Add missing "#interrupt-cells" to examples
MAINTAINERS: Update EP93XX ARM ARCHITECTURE maintainer
soc: ep93xx: drop reference to removed EP93XX_SOC_COMMON config
net: cirrus: use u8 for addr to calm down sparse
dmaengine: cirrus: use snprintf() to calm down gcc 13.3.0
dmaengine: ep93xx: Fix a NULL vs IS_ERR() check in probe()
pinctrl: ep93xx: Fix raster pins typo
spi: ep93xx: update kerneldoc comments for ep93xx_spi
clk: ep93xx: Fix off by one in ep93xx_div_recalc_rate()
clk: ep93xx: add module license
dmaengine: cirrus: remove platform code
ASoC: cirrus: edb93xx: Delete driver
ARM: ep93xx: soc: drop defines
ARM: ep93xx: delete all boardfiles
ata: pata_ep93xx: remove legacy pinctrl use
pwm: ep93xx: drop legacy pinctrl
ARM: ep93xx: DT for the Cirrus ep93xx SoC platforms
ARM: dts: ep93xx: Add EDB9302 DT
ARM: dts: ep93xx: add ts7250 board
ARM: dts: add Cirrus EP93XX SoC .dtsi
...
The OCP board used a BlueField's GPIO pin for entering
low power mode. That board was not commercialized and
has been dropped from production so all its code is unused.
The new hardware requirement is to trigger a graceful shutdown
when that GPIO pin is toggled. So replace the unused low power
mode with a graceful shutdown.
Signed-off-by: Asmaa Mnebhi <asmaa@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: David Thompson <davthompson@nvidia.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240611134327.30975-1-asmaa@nvidia.com
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.com>
When building with clang, there are two section mismatch warnings:
WARNING: modpost: vmlinux: section mismatch in reference: at91_poweroff_probe+0x7c (section: .text) -> at91_wakeup_status (section: .init.text)
WARNING: modpost: vmlinux: section mismatch in reference: at91_shdwc_probe+0xcc (section: .text) -> at91_wakeup_status (section: .init.text)
Drop '__init' from at91_wakeup_status() to clear up the mismatch.
Fixes: dde74a5de8 ("power: reset: at91-sama5d2_shdwc: Stop using module_platform_driver_probe()")
Fixes: 099806de68 ("power: reset: at91-poweroff: Stop using module_platform_driver_probe()")
Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com>
Reviewed-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.com>
Use device life-cycle managed register function to simplify probe error
path and eliminate need for explicit remove function.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Davis <afd@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new(), which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231105094712.3706799-4-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new(), which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231105094712.3706799-3-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new(), which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Returning an error if unregister_restart_handler() failed has no effect
but triggering another error message. So converting this driver to
.remove_new() has no effect but to suppress the duplicated error message.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231104211501.3676352-30-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new(), which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231104211501.3676352-29-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new(), which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231104211501.3676352-28-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new(), which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231104211501.3676352-27-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new(), which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231104211501.3676352-26-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new(), which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231104211501.3676352-25-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new(), which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231104211501.3676352-24-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new(), which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231104211501.3676352-23-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new(), which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231104211501.3676352-22-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new(), which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231104211501.3676352-21-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.com>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new(), which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231104211501.3676352-20-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.com>
On today's platforms the benefit of platform_driver_probe() isn't that
relevant any more. It allows to drop some code after booting (or module
loading) for .probe() and discard the .remove() function completely if
the driver is built-in. This typically saves a few 100k.
The downside of platform_driver_probe() is that the driver cannot be
bound and unbound at runtime which is ancient and so slightly
complicates testing. There are also thoughts to deprecate
platform_driver_probe() because it adds some complexity in the driver
core for little gain. Also many drivers don't use it correctly. This
driver for example misses to mark the driver struct with __ref which is
needed to suppress a (W=1) modpost warning.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231104211501.3676352-19-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.com>
On today's platforms the benefit of platform_driver_probe() isn't that
relevant any more. It allows to drop some code after booting (or module
loading) for .probe() and discard the .remove() function completely if
the driver is built-in. This typically saves a few 100k.
The downside of platform_driver_probe() is that the driver cannot be
bound and unbound at runtime which is ancient and so slightly
complicates testing. There are also thoughts to deprecate
platform_driver_probe() because it adds some complexity in the driver
core for little gain. Also many drivers don't use it correctly. This
driver for example misses to mark the driver struct with __ref which is
needed to suppress a (W=1) modpost warning.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231104211501.3676352-18-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.com>
On today's platforms the benefit of platform_driver_probe() isn't that
relevant any more. It allows to drop some code after booting (or module
loading) for .probe() and discard the .remove() function completely if
the driver is built-in. This typically saves a few 100k.
The downside of platform_driver_probe() is that the driver cannot be
bound and unbound at runtime which is ancient and so slightly
complicates testing. There are also thoughts to deprecate
platform_driver_probe() because it adds some complexity in the driver
core for little gain. Also many drivers don't use it correctly. This
driver for example misses to mark the driver struct with __ref which is
needed to suppress a (W=1) modpost warning.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231104211501.3676352-17-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.com>
