The current implementation of the async flip wm0/ddb optimization
does not work at all. The biggest problem is that we skip the
whole intel_pipe_update_{start,end}() dance and thus never actually
complete the commit that is trying to do the wm/ddb change.
To fix this we need to move the do_async_flip flag to the crtc
state since we handle commits per-pipe, not per-plane.
Also since all planes can now be included in the first/last
"async flip" (which gets converted to a sync flip to do the
wm/ddb mangling) we need to be more careful when checking if
the plane state is async flip comptatible. Only planes doing
the async flip should be checked and other planes are perfectly
fine not adhereing to any async flip related limitations.
However for subsequent commits which are actually going do the
async flip in hardware we want to make sure no other planes
are in the state. That should never happen assuming we did our
job correctly, so we'll toss in a WARN to make sure we catch
any bugs here.
Cc: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
Fixes: c3639f3be4 ("drm/i915: Use wm0 only during async flips for DG2")
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220214105532.13049-4-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
Since the async flip state check is done very late and
thus it can see potentially all the planes in the state
(due to the wm/ddb optimization) we need to move the
"can the requested plane do async flips at all?" check
much earlier. For this purpose we introduce
intel_async_flip_check_uapi() that gets called early during
the atomic check.
And for good measure we'll throw in a couple of basic checks:
- is the crtc active?
- was a modeset flagged?
- is+was the plane enabled?
Though atm all of those should be guaranteed by the fact
that the async flip can only be requested through the legacy
page flip ioctl.
Cc: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
Fixes: c3639f3be4 ("drm/i915: Use wm0 only during async flips for DG2")
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220214105532.13049-3-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
Some users are suffering with PSR2 issues that are under debug or
issues that were root caused to panel firmware bugs, to make life of
those users easier here adding a option to disable PSR2 with kernel
parameters so they can still benefit from PSR1 power savings.
Using the same enable_psr that is current used to turn the whole
feature on or off and allowing user to select up to what PSR version
it should enable.
Right now users only set this parameter to 0 when they want to disable
PSR1 and PSR2 or don't add it at all leaving it to per-chip behavior
so it should not cause a bad impact on users.
v2:
- changing enable_psr values (Ville and Rodrigo)
Link: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/4951
Cc: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220224202523.993560-1-jose.souza@intel.com
Currently we are observing occasional screen flickering when
PSR2 selective fetch is enabled. More specifically glitch seems
to happen on full frame update when cursor moves to coords
x = -1 or y = -1.
According to Bspec SF Single full frame should not be set if
SF Partial Frame Enable is not set. This happened to be true for
ADLP as PSR2_MAN_TRK_CTL_ENABLE is always set and for ADL_P it's
actually "SF Partial Frame Enable" (Bit 31).
Setting "SF Partial Frame Enable" bit also on full update seems to
fix screen flickering.
Also make code more clear by setting PSR2_MAN_TRK_CTL_ENABLE
only if not on ADL_P. Bit 31 has different meaning in ADL_P.
Bspec: 49274
v2: Fix Mihai Harpau email address
v3: Modify commit message and remove unnecessary comment
Tested-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Fixes: 7f6002e580 ("drm/i915/display: Enable PSR2 selective fetch by default")
Reported-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Cc: Mihai Harpau <mharpau@gmail.com>
Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Bugzilla: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/5077
Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220225070228.855138-1-jouni.hogander@intel.com
To catch up with recent rounds of pull requests
and get some drm-misc dependencies so we can merge
linux/string_helpers related changes.
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Commit d5ce34da31
("drm/i915: Add state verification for the TypeC port mode")
added a verification to the TypeC AUX power well enable()/disable()
hooks to check if the TypeC port related to this power well is properly
locked. If the disabling happens asynchronously the verification is
skipped, since in this case the port is unlocked. The detection of
asnychronous disabling doesn't work as intended though, since the power
well's reference count is always 0 when its disable() hook is called
(and since there won't be any domain reference held for this power well
either, the verification is always skipped); remove the verification
from the disable() hook for now. In the power well's enable() hook the
power well's reference will be always >0 and there won't be any
asynchronous disabling pending for it, so we can drop the async refcount
check from there.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220222165137.1004194-4-imre.deak@intel.com
Instead of open-coding the call of the power wells' enable()/disable()
hooks use the corresponding helper functions. This will also ensure that
the power well's cached-enable state is always up-to-date. Luckily the
lack of this updating hasn't been a problem, since the state either
didn't change (in intel_display_power_set_target_dc_state()), or got
updated subsequently (for vlv_cmnlane_wa(), in the following
intel_power_domains_sync_hw()).
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220222165137.1004194-3-imre.deak@intel.com
The POWER_DOMAIN_TRANSCODER() macro depends on the
POWER_DOMAIN_TRANSCODER_A/B .. DSI_A/C enum values to be consecutive,
move POWER_DOMAIN_TRANSCODER_VDSC_PW2 after these to ensure this. The
wrong order didn't cause a problem, since the DSI_A/C domains are in
always-on power wells on all relevant platforms. The same power well
ends up being enabled/disabled when the VDSC_PW2 domain is selected
incorrectly.
While at it add a code comment about enum values that need to stay
consecutive.
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220222165137.1004194-2-imre.deak@intel.com
When calculating pipe_mode and when doing readout we need
to order our steps correctly.
1. We start with adjusted_mode crtc timings being populated
with the transcoder timings (either via readout or
compute_config(). These will be per-segment for MSO.
2. For all other uses we want the full crtc timings so
we ask intel_splitter_adjust_timings() to expand
the per-segment numbers to their full glory
3. If bigjoiner is used we the divide the full numbers
down to per-pipe numbers using intel_bigjoiner_adjust_timings()
During readout we also have to reconstruct the adjusted_mode
normal timings (ie. not the crtc_ stuff). These are supposed
to reflect the full timings of the display. So we grab these
between steps 2 and 3.
The "user" mode readout (mainly done for fastboot purposes)
should be whatever mode the user would have used had they
asked us to do a modeset. We want the full timings for this
as the per-segment timings are not suppoesed to be user visible.
Also the user mode normal timings hdisplay/vdisplay need to
match PIPESRC (that is where we get our PIPESRC size
we doing a modeset with a user supplied mode).
And we end up with
- adjusted_mode normal timigns == full timings
- adjusted_mode crtc timings == transcoder timings
(per-segment timings for MSO, full timings otherwise)
- pipe_mode normal/crtc timings == pipe timings
(full timings divided by the number of bigjoiner pipes, if any)
- user mode normal timings == full timings with
hdisplay/vdisplay replaced with PIPESRC size
- user mode crtc timings == full timings
Yes, that is a lot of timings. One day we'll try to remove
some of the ones we don't actually need to keep around...
Reviewed-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220223131315.18016-10-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
bigjoiner_pipes==0 leads bigjoiner_master_pipe() to
do BIT(ffs(0)-1) which is undefined behaviour. The code should
actually still work fine since the only place we provoke
that is intel_crtc_bigjoiner_slave_pipes() and it'll bitwise
AND the result with 0, so doesn't really matter what we get
out of bigjoiner_master_pipe(). But best not provoke undefined
behaviour anyway.
Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
Fixes: a6e7a006f5 ("drm/i915: Change bigjoiner state tracking to use the pipe bitmask")
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220223131315.18016-2-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
Checking by >= DISPLAY_VER(12) made sense when the support for Tiger
Lake was added. However now it only leads to wrong behavior when adding
more platforms since it's expected they either don't have DMC to load
or they have their own blob.
Logs from DG2 loading on a CFL host, without having a DMC firmware
defined:
<6>[ 0.000000] DMI: Intel Corporation CoffeeLake Client Platform/CoffeeLake S UDIMM RVP, BIOS CNLSFWR1.R00.X220.B00.2103302221 03/30/2021
...
<6>[ 2.706607] pci 0000:03:00.0: [8086:56a0] type 00 class 0x030000
...
<7>[ 6.340397] i915 0000:03:00.0: [drm:intel_dmc_ucode_init [i915]] Loading i915/tgl_dmc_ver2_12.bin
<7>[ 6.341841] i915 0000:03:00.0: [drm:intel_fbc_init [i915]] Sanitized enable_fbc value: 1
<3>[ 6.342432] genirq: Flags mismatch irq 0. 00000080 (i915) vs. 00015a00 (timer)
<6>[ 6.346283] i915 0000:03:00.0: [drm] Finished loading DMC firmware i915/tgl_dmc_ver2_12.bin (v2.12)
<3>[ 6.385756] i915 0000:03:00.0: Device initialization failed (-16)
<5>[ 6.385778] i915 0000:03:00.0: Please file a bug on drm/i915; see https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/wikis/How-to-file-i915-bugs for details.
<4>[ 6.385782] i915: probe of 0000:03:00.0 failed with error -16
TGL is the only platform left with DISPLAY_VER() == 12 that is not
handled already in the if/else ladder, so handle it specifically.
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ramalingam C <ramalingam.c@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220223210933.3049143-1-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
Silence [-Wmissing-prototypes] sparse warnings from the display folder
such as:
../drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/clk_mgr/dcn315/dcn315_smu.c:126:5: warning: no previous prototype for ‘dcn315_smu_send_msg_with_param’ [-Wmissing-prototypes]
126 | int dcn315_smu_send_msg_with_param(
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
v2: drop unused function dcn315_smu_set_voltage_via_phyclk() to avoid
adding a warning (Alex)
Cc: Qingqing Zhuo (Lillian) <qingqing.zhuo@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@amd.com>
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Magali Lemes <magalilemes00@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Silence the following sparse warnings:
../drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dce112/dce112_resource.c:865:16:
sparse: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
../drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dce110/dce110_hw_sequencer.c:1588:84:
sparse: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
../drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/dce110/dce110_hw_sequencer.c:2725:84:
sparse: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
../drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/core/dc_resource.c:1919:16:
sparse: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer
v2: drop removal of default case to avoid adding warnings (Alex)
Reviewed-by: Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Magali Lemes <magalilemes00@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
When CONFIG_DRM_AMD_DC_DCN is not set, the function
'dm_helpers_enable_periodic_detection' doesn't have its prototype defined,
causing the following warning:
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_helpers.c:805:6:
warning: no previous prototype for function 'dm_helpers_enable_periodic_detection' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
void dm_helpers_enable_periodic_detection(struct dc_context *ctx, bool enable)
^
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_helpers.c:805:1:
note: declare 'static' if the function is not intended to be used outside
of this translation unit
void dm_helpers_enable_periodic_detection(struct dc_context *ctx, bool enable)
^
static
1 warning generated.
This commit silences this warning by adding a conditional directive
around the mentioned function, and also corrects a small spelling error.
Reviewed-by: Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@amd.com>
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Magali Lemes <magalilemes00@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Part of the documentation of the 'dc_process_dmub_aux_transfer_async'
function was misplaced, being put together with the
‘dc_enable_dmub_notifications’ documentation. This caused the following
warning:
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/core/dc.c:3757: warning:
expecting prototype for dc_process_dmub_aux_transfer_async(). Prototype
was for dc_enable_dmub_notifications() instead
This commit fixes the warning by placing the function documentations in
their right place.
Reviewed-by: Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@amd.com>
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Magali Lemes <magalilemes00@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[Why]
During DC init, we read power management tables from PMFW. This info is
exchanged in the form of a binary blob inside gpu memory. In order to
parse the binary blob, the correct struct needs to be used.
[How]
Fix dcn316's definition of the DfPstateTable_t struct to align with PMFW
Signed-off-by: Leo Li <sunpeng.li@amd.com>
Acked-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Acked-by: Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
