[Why]
NV14 is using its own ip params that's different from other
DCN2.0 ASICs.
[How]
Add ASIC revision check to make sure NV14 gets correct
ip params.
Signed-off-by: Zhan Liu <zhan.liu@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Nicholas Kazlauskas <nicholas.kazlauskas@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
As will call unload kms when initialize fail, and the unload kms will
send event 3 and 4, so don't need event 3 and 4 in device init.
Signed-off-by: Emily Deng <Emily.Deng@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Zhan Liu <zhan.liu@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
still need to init csb even for SRIOV
v2:
drop init_pg() for gfx10 at all since
PG and GFX off feature will be fully controled
by RLC and SMU fw for gfx10
v3:
drop the flush_gpu_tlb lines since we consider
it is only usefull in emulation
Signed-off-by: Monk Liu <Monk.Liu@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Hawking Zhang <Hawking.Zhang@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
To align with the scheme from gfx9
disabling GFX ring after VM shutdown could avoid
garbage data be fetched to GFX RB which may lead
to unnecessary screw up on GFX
Signed-off-by: Monk Liu <Monk.Liu@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Hawking Zhang <Hawking.Zhang@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
issue:
kernel would report a warning from a double unpin
during the driver unloading on the CSB bo
why:
we unpin it during hw_fini, and there will be another
unpin in sw_fini on CSB bo.
fix:
actually we don't need to pin/unpin it during
hw_init/fini since it is created with kernel pinned,
we only need to fullfill the CSB again during hw_init
to prevent CSB/VRAM lost after S3
v2:
get_csb in init_rlc so hw_init() will make CSIB content
back even after reset or s3
v3:
use bo_create_kernel instead of bo_create_reserved for CSB
otherwise the bo_free_kernel() on CSB is not aligned and
would lead to its internal reserve pending there forever
take care of gfx7/8 as well
Signed-off-by: Monk Liu <Monk.Liu@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Hawking Zhang <Hawking.Zhang@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Xiaojie Yuan <xiaojie.yuan@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
[Why]
"num_vmid" and "num_dsc" are missing within NV14's resource caps structure.
[How]
Add the missing parts.
Signed-off-by: Zhan Liu <zhan.liu@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Similar to for i915_active.mutex, we require each class of i915_active
to have distinct lockdep chains as some, but by no means all,
i915_active are used within the shrinker and so have much more severe
usage constraints. By using a lockclass local to i915_active_init() all
i915_active workers have the same lock class, and we may generate false
positives when waiting for the i915_active. If we push the lockclass
into the caller, each class of i915_active will have distinct lockdep
chains.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Acked-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191202140133.2444217-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
The unaligned ioread32() will make us read byte by byte looking for the
vbt. We could just as well have done a ioread8() + a shift and avoid the
extra confusion on how we are looking for "$VBT".
However when using ACPI it's guaranteed the VBT is 4-byte aligned
per spec, so we can probably assume it here as well.
v2: do not try to simplify the loop by eliminating the auxiliary counter
(Jani and Ville)
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191126225110.8127-4-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
We don't need to keep the pci rom mapped during the entire
intel_bios_init() anymore. Move it to the previous copy_vbt() function
and rename it to oprom_get_vbt() since now it's responsible to to all
operations related to get the vbt from the oprom.
v2: fix double __iomem attribute detected by sparse
v3: fix missing unmap on success (Ville)
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191126225110.8127-3-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
When we map the VBT through pci_map_rom() we may not be allowed
to simply discard the address space and go on reading the memory.
That doesn't work on my test system, but by dumping the rom via
sysfs I can can get the correct vbt. So change our find_vbt() to do
the same as done by pci_read_rom(), i.e. use memcpy_fromio().
v2: the just the minimal changes by not bothering with the unaligned io
reads: this can be done on top (from Ville and Jani)
v3: drop const in function return since now we are copying the vbt,
rather than just finding it
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191126225110.8127-2-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
eDP spec states that when sink enconters a problem that prevents it
to keep PSR running it should set PSR status to internal error and
set the reason why it happen to PSR_ERROR_STATUS but it is not how it
was implemented.
But also I don't want to change this behavior, who knows if there is
a panel out there that only set the PSR_ERROR_STATUS.
So here refactoring the code a bit to make more easy to read what was
state above as more checks will be added to this function.
v2:
returning a int instead of a bool in psr_get_status_and_error_status()
Cc: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Cc: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191128014852.214135-2-jose.souza@intel.com
The "err" label is not really "err", but rather "out" since the return
path is shared between error condition and normal path. This broke when
commit 03cea61076 ("drm/i915/dsb: fix extra warning on error path
handling") added a "dsb->cmd_buf = NULL;" there, making DSB to stop
working since now all writes would pass-through via mmio.
Remove the set to NULL since it's actually not needed: we only set it if
all steps are successful. While at it, rename the label so this confusion
doesn't happen again.
Fixes: 03cea61076 ("drm/i915/dsb: fix extra warning on error path handling")
Resolves: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/8
Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191127221119.384754-1-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
The bspec tells us 'Program SHPD_FILTER_CNT with the "500 microseconds
adjusted" value before enabling hotplug detection' on CNP+. We haven't
been touching this register at all thus far, but we should probably
follow the bspec's guidance.
The register also exists on LPT and SPT, but there isn't any specific
guidance I can find on how we should be programming it there so let's
leave it be for now.
Bspec: 4342
Bspec: 31297
Bspec: 8407
Bspec: 49305
Bspec: 50473
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191127221314.575575-3-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
When looking at SDEISR to determine the connection status of combo
outputs, we should use the phy index rather than the port index.
Although they're usually the same thing, EHL's DDI-D (port D) is
attached to PHY-A and SDEISR doesn't even have bits for a "D" output.
It's also possible that future platforms may map DDIs (the internal
display engine programming units) to PHYs (the output handling on the IO
side) in ways where port!=phy, so let's look at the PHY index by
default.
v2: Rename to intel_combo_phy_connected. (Lucas)
Fixes: 719d240026 ("drm/i915/ehl: Enable DDI-D")
Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191127221314.575575-2-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
