This patch adds a dedicated self_test_reg variable. This is also a step
to let new drivers make use of `adis_initial_startup()`. Some devices
use MSG_CTRL reg to request a self_test command while others use the
GLOB_CMD register.
Signed-off-by: Nuno Sá <nuno.sa@analog.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexandru Ardelean <alexandru.ardelean@analog.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Currently reference counts are implemented by locking service_spinlock
and then incrementing the service's ->ref_count field, calling
kfree() when the last reference has been dropped. But at the same
time, there's code in multiple places that dereferences pointers
to services without having a reference, so there could be a race there.
It should be possible to avoid taking any lock in unlock_service()
or service_release() because we are setting a single array element
to NULL, and on service creation, a mutex is locked before looking
for a NULL spot to put the new service in.
Using a struct kref and RCU-delaying the freeing of services fixes
this race condition while still making it possible to skip
grabbing a reference in many places. Also it avoids the need to
acquire a single spinlock when e.g. taking a reference on
state->services[i] when somebody else is in the middle of taking
a reference on state->services[j].
Signed-off-by: Marcelo Diop-Gonzalez <marcgonzalez@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/3bf6f1ec6ace64d7072025505e165b8dd18b25ca.1581532523.git.marcgonzalez@google.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:
struct foo {
int stuff;
struct boo array[];
};
By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertenly introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 7649773293 ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200211211219.GA673@embeddedor
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:
struct foo {
int stuff;
struct boo array[];
};
By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertenly introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 7649773293 ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200211211722.GA1640@embeddedor
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Lockdep is complaining about recursive locking, because it can't make
a difference between locked skb_queues. Annotate nested locks and avoid
double bh_disable/enable.
[...]
insmod/815 is trying to acquire lock:
cb7d6418 (&(&list->lock)->rlock){+...}, at: wfx_tx_queues_clear+0xfc/0x198 [wfx]
but task is already holding lock:
cb7d61f4 (&(&list->lock)->rlock){+...}, at: wfx_tx_queues_clear+0xa0/0x198 [wfx]
[...]
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0
----
lock(&(&list->lock)->rlock);
lock(&(&list->lock)->rlock);
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 9bca45f3d6 ("staging: wfx: allow to send 802.11 frames")
Signed-off-by: Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/5e30397af95854b4a7deea073b730c00229f42ba.1581416843.git.mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
We do not currently provide routing information for NI PCIe-6251 and
PCI-6259 boards, but they are functionally identical to the PCI-6251 and
PCI-6259 boards and can share their routing information. (This has been
confirmed for the PCIe-6251 by Éric Piel, using the "NI MAX" software
for Windows. It is hoped that it applies to PCIe-6259, but has not yet
been checked due to lack of hardware.) Initialize the `alt_route_name`
member of the board information for PCIe-6251 and PCIe-6259 to allow
them to make use of the routing information provided for PCI-6251 and
PCI-6259 respectively.
Cc: Éric Piel <piel@delmic.com>
Cc: Spencer E. Olson <olsonse@umich.edu>
Signed-off-by: Ian Abbott <abbotti@mev.co.uk>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200207151400.272678-5-abbotti@mev.co.uk
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
We do not have or do not provide routing information for all supported
boards. Some of the boards for which we do not provide routing
information actually have routes that are identical to a similar board
for which we already provide routing information.
To allow boards to share identical routing information, add an
`alt_route_name` member to `struct ni_board_struct`. This will be
initialized to `NULL` for all boards except those that will use make use
of the identical routing information that has been provided for a
similar board, in which case it will name that board. Pass the
`alt_route_name` member value to `ni_assign_device_routes()` as the
`alt_board_name` parameter, which it will use if no routing information
could be found for the actual board name.
Cc: Éric Piel <piel@delmic.com>
Cc: Spencer E. Olson <olsonse@umich.edu>
Signed-off-by: Ian Abbott <abbotti@mev.co.uk>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200207151400.272678-4-abbotti@mev.co.uk
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
We do not have or provide routing information available for all
supported boards. Some of the boards for which we do not currently
provide routing information actually have identical routes to a similar
board for which we do provide routing information. To avoid having to
provide duplicate routing information, add an "alternate board name"
parameter (possibly `NULl`) to `ni_assign_device_routes()` and
`ni_find_device_routes()`. If the routing information cannot be found
for the actual board name, try finding it using the alternate board
name.
Cc: Éric Piel <piel@delmic.com>
Cc: Spencer E. Olson <olsonse@umich.edu>
Signed-off-by: Ian Abbott <abbotti@mev.co.uk>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200207151400.272678-3-abbotti@mev.co.uk
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Split out the loops in `ni_find_valid_routes()` into separate functions:
* ni_find_route_values(device_family) to find the list of route values
for a device family (e.g "ni-mseries"); and
* ni_find_valid_routes(board_name) to find the set of valid routes for a
board name.
The functions above return `NULL` if the information is not found (as we
do not currently have the routing information available for all
supported boards).
Cc: Éric Piel <piel@delmic.com>
Cc: Spencer E. Olson <olsonse@umich.edu>
Signed-off-by: Ian Abbott <abbotti@mev.co.uk>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200207151400.272678-2-abbotti@mev.co.uk
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
