drm/ttm: Fix ttm_bo_swapout() infinite LRU walk on swapout failure

When ttm_tt_swapout() fails, the current code calls
ttm_resource_add_bulk_move() followed by ttm_resource_move_to_lru_tail()
to restore the resource's bulk_move membership.

However, ttm_resource_move_to_lru_tail() places the resource at the tail
of the LRU list which, relative to the walk cursor's hitch node (placed
immediately after the resource when it was yielded), puts the resource
*in front of the* the hitch. The next list_for_each_entry_continue() from
the hitch finds the same resource again, causing an infinite loop.

Fix by deferring del_bulk_move to the success path only.

On the success path, TTM_TT_FLAG_SWAPPED has just been set by
ttm_tt_swapout() but the resource is still tracked in the bulk_move range,
so ttm_resource_del_bulk_move()'s !ttm_resource_unevictable() guard would
incorrectly skip the removal. Introduce
ttm_resource_del_bulk_move_unevictable() which bypasses that guard.

Reported-by: Jatin Kataria <jkataria@netflix.com>
Fixes: fc5d96670e ("drm/ttm: Move swapped objects off the manager's LRU list")
Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Cc: <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v6.13+
Assisted-by: GitHub_Copilot:claude-sonnet-4.6
Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Tested-by: Boqun Feng <boqun@kernel.org>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260428094442.16985-1-thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com
This commit is contained in:
Thomas Hellström
2026-04-28 11:44:42 +02:00
parent 459d75523b
commit b2ed01e7ad
3 changed files with 21 additions and 10 deletions

View File

@@ -1177,17 +1177,13 @@ ttm_bo_swapout_cb(struct ttm_lru_walk *walk, struct ttm_buffer_object *bo)
bdev->funcs->swap_notify(bo);
if (ttm_tt_is_populated(tt)) {
spin_lock(&bdev->lru_lock);
ttm_resource_del_bulk_move(bo->resource, bo);
spin_unlock(&bdev->lru_lock);
ret = ttm_tt_swapout(bdev, tt, swapout_walk->gfp_flags);
spin_lock(&bdev->lru_lock);
if (ret)
ttm_resource_add_bulk_move(bo->resource, bo);
ttm_resource_move_to_lru_tail(bo->resource);
spin_unlock(&bdev->lru_lock);
if (!ret) {
spin_lock(&bdev->lru_lock);
ttm_resource_del_bulk_move_unevictable(bo->resource, bo);
ttm_resource_move_to_lru_tail(bo->resource);
spin_unlock(&bdev->lru_lock);
}
}
out:

View File

@@ -292,6 +292,19 @@ void ttm_resource_del_bulk_move(struct ttm_resource *res,
ttm_lru_bulk_move_del(bo->bulk_move, res);
}
/*
* Remove a resource from its bulk_move, bypassing the unevictable check.
* Use only when the resource is known to still be tracked in the range despite
* the BO having just become unevictable; asserts that this is the case.
*/
void ttm_resource_del_bulk_move_unevictable(struct ttm_resource *res,
struct ttm_buffer_object *bo)
{
WARN_ON_ONCE(!ttm_resource_unevictable(res, bo));
if (bo->bulk_move)
ttm_lru_bulk_move_del(bo->bulk_move, res);
}
/* Move a resource to the LRU or bulk tail */
void ttm_resource_move_to_lru_tail(struct ttm_resource *res)
{

View File

@@ -448,6 +448,8 @@ void ttm_resource_add_bulk_move(struct ttm_resource *res,
struct ttm_buffer_object *bo);
void ttm_resource_del_bulk_move(struct ttm_resource *res,
struct ttm_buffer_object *bo);
void ttm_resource_del_bulk_move_unevictable(struct ttm_resource *res,
struct ttm_buffer_object *bo);
void ttm_resource_move_to_lru_tail(struct ttm_resource *res);
void ttm_resource_init(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo,