mirror of
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2026-05-16 10:11:38 -04:00
drm/ttm: Fix ttm_bo_swapout() infinite LRU walk on swapout failure
When ttm_tt_swapout() fails, the current code calls
ttm_resource_add_bulk_move() followed by ttm_resource_move_to_lru_tail()
to restore the resource's bulk_move membership.
However, ttm_resource_move_to_lru_tail() places the resource at the tail
of the LRU list which, relative to the walk cursor's hitch node (placed
immediately after the resource when it was yielded), puts the resource
*in front of the* the hitch. The next list_for_each_entry_continue() from
the hitch finds the same resource again, causing an infinite loop.
Fix by deferring del_bulk_move to the success path only.
On the success path, TTM_TT_FLAG_SWAPPED has just been set by
ttm_tt_swapout() but the resource is still tracked in the bulk_move range,
so ttm_resource_del_bulk_move()'s !ttm_resource_unevictable() guard would
incorrectly skip the removal. Introduce
ttm_resource_del_bulk_move_unevictable() which bypasses that guard.
Reported-by: Jatin Kataria <jkataria@netflix.com>
Fixes: fc5d96670e ("drm/ttm: Move swapped objects off the manager's LRU list")
Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Cc: <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v6.13+
Assisted-by: GitHub_Copilot:claude-sonnet-4.6
Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Tested-by: Boqun Feng <boqun@kernel.org>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260428094442.16985-1-thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1177,17 +1177,13 @@ ttm_bo_swapout_cb(struct ttm_lru_walk *walk, struct ttm_buffer_object *bo)
|
||||
bdev->funcs->swap_notify(bo);
|
||||
|
||||
if (ttm_tt_is_populated(tt)) {
|
||||
spin_lock(&bdev->lru_lock);
|
||||
ttm_resource_del_bulk_move(bo->resource, bo);
|
||||
spin_unlock(&bdev->lru_lock);
|
||||
|
||||
ret = ttm_tt_swapout(bdev, tt, swapout_walk->gfp_flags);
|
||||
|
||||
spin_lock(&bdev->lru_lock);
|
||||
if (ret)
|
||||
ttm_resource_add_bulk_move(bo->resource, bo);
|
||||
ttm_resource_move_to_lru_tail(bo->resource);
|
||||
spin_unlock(&bdev->lru_lock);
|
||||
if (!ret) {
|
||||
spin_lock(&bdev->lru_lock);
|
||||
ttm_resource_del_bulk_move_unevictable(bo->resource, bo);
|
||||
ttm_resource_move_to_lru_tail(bo->resource);
|
||||
spin_unlock(&bdev->lru_lock);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
out:
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -292,6 +292,19 @@ void ttm_resource_del_bulk_move(struct ttm_resource *res,
|
||||
ttm_lru_bulk_move_del(bo->bulk_move, res);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Remove a resource from its bulk_move, bypassing the unevictable check.
|
||||
* Use only when the resource is known to still be tracked in the range despite
|
||||
* the BO having just become unevictable; asserts that this is the case.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
void ttm_resource_del_bulk_move_unevictable(struct ttm_resource *res,
|
||||
struct ttm_buffer_object *bo)
|
||||
{
|
||||
WARN_ON_ONCE(!ttm_resource_unevictable(res, bo));
|
||||
if (bo->bulk_move)
|
||||
ttm_lru_bulk_move_del(bo->bulk_move, res);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* Move a resource to the LRU or bulk tail */
|
||||
void ttm_resource_move_to_lru_tail(struct ttm_resource *res)
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -448,6 +448,8 @@ void ttm_resource_add_bulk_move(struct ttm_resource *res,
|
||||
struct ttm_buffer_object *bo);
|
||||
void ttm_resource_del_bulk_move(struct ttm_resource *res,
|
||||
struct ttm_buffer_object *bo);
|
||||
void ttm_resource_del_bulk_move_unevictable(struct ttm_resource *res,
|
||||
struct ttm_buffer_object *bo);
|
||||
void ttm_resource_move_to_lru_tail(struct ttm_resource *res);
|
||||
|
||||
void ttm_resource_init(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo,
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user