PM: runtime: Do not clear needs_force_resume with enabled runtime PM

Commit 89d9cec3b1 ("PM: runtime: Clear power.needs_force_resume in
pm_runtime_reinit()") added provisional clearing of power.needs_force_resume
to pm_runtime_reinit(), but it is done unconditionally which is a
mistake because pm_runtime_reinit() may race with driver probing
and removal [1].

To address this, notice that power.needs_force_resume should never
be set when runtime PM is enabled and so it only needs to be cleared
when runtime PM is disabled, and update pm_runtime_init() to only
clear that flag when runtime PM is disabled.

Fixes: 89d9cec3b1 ("PM: runtime: Clear power.needs_force_resume in pm_runtime_reinit()")
Reported-by: Ed Tsai <ed.tsai@mediatek.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/20251215122154.3180001-1-ed.tsai@mediatek.com/ [1]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Cc: 6.17+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 6.17+
Reviewed-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/12807571.O9o76ZdvQC@rafael.j.wysocki
This commit is contained in:
Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-12-15 15:21:34 +01:00
parent 8f0b4cce44
commit 359afc8eb0

View File

@@ -1868,16 +1868,18 @@ void pm_runtime_init(struct device *dev)
*/
void pm_runtime_reinit(struct device *dev)
{
if (!pm_runtime_enabled(dev)) {
if (dev->power.runtime_status == RPM_ACTIVE)
pm_runtime_set_suspended(dev);
if (dev->power.irq_safe) {
spin_lock_irq(&dev->power.lock);
dev->power.irq_safe = 0;
spin_unlock_irq(&dev->power.lock);
if (dev->parent)
pm_runtime_put(dev->parent);
}
if (pm_runtime_enabled(dev))
return;
if (dev->power.runtime_status == RPM_ACTIVE)
pm_runtime_set_suspended(dev);
if (dev->power.irq_safe) {
spin_lock_irq(&dev->power.lock);
dev->power.irq_safe = 0;
spin_unlock_irq(&dev->power.lock);
if (dev->parent)
pm_runtime_put(dev->parent);
}
/*
* Clear power.needs_force_resume in case it has been set by